Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: S-300 delivery news  (Read 20448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gottfrid

  • ستوان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1997
  • 00
  • Respect: +298
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #175 on: June 18, 2010, 04:38:07 PM »
0
Iran should support the Chechen's and arm them so it be a lesson for the Russians...

That would be completely hypocrisy and wouldn't allow Iran to protest against the U.S' backing of Saddam in the iran-iraq war.

Offline husseinibnali

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 448
  • Respect: +40
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #176 on: June 18, 2010, 05:40:34 PM »
0
think of the positives, now iran got 700M to spend on its defense from the 2005 budget
Sorry to make you sad brother but the 700 million are already paid by Iran

Offline sarmad17

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 806
  • iq
  • Respect: +10
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #177 on: June 18, 2010, 05:48:06 PM »
0
 yes and if a contract is cancelled money is returned,
Watch this NEW VID---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3CTpRJ_d9Y


 "We have clearly declared that the nuclear bomb belongs to politically retarded governments who lack logic," Ahmadinejad

Online 1979Change

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2739
  • ir
  • Best devotion to Allah is not to make show of it.
  • Respect: +1316
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #178 on: June 18, 2010, 07:37:58 PM »
0
yes and if a contract is cancelled money is returned,

It looks that everything falling in place so US can attack Iran!

I hope the IR-300 that Iran is designing is at least as good as S-300 and we can mass-produce them soon!

Offline ALMANZOR

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #179 on: June 18, 2010, 08:30:32 PM »
0
Iran needs a AA defense system for high altitude, the planes the U.S. and Zionists are prepared to counter the threat of Russian S-300, the only people who would seriously embarrass the attackers would be the S-400, but Russia is the store for them and to compensate for some friendly countries, but Iran and the rest of the world that is normally sold already surpassed technologically or existing measures against them. the S-300 missiles to be a magnificent AA, are not 100% sure, like the Patriot AA, defects and early versions are not very effective.
Iran should be concerned especially cruise missiles, B-52 and B-1B bombers. Regarding the B-2 are too expensive to put them in danger in a situation that is known to be very intense flak, so I do not think to intervene significantly.
But first of these, took action electronic Gerra measures after the defense attacked Iranian F-15s and F-16 United States and Jews, this is where you play the winning or losing the propaganda battle and the military Iranian military had done so in the first waves of attacks that provides a significant number of F-15 and F-16, could become a disaster an attack on Iranian facilities, and hence the withdrawal of the plan of attack U.S.

It is essential to have everything needed to cause maximum casualties in the early stages of the attack, the absence of technology to compete in the only solution for the Iranian Defense is a saturation of AA defense, the use of low-frequency radar different decoys and radar installations and air entry into the permanent form of Iranian fighters fly over the airspace, especially for such a role perhaps better would be the F-14.

Regards to all, and strength to Iran from Spain of a Spanish.

Online Eagle2009

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 3550
  • Respect: +464
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #180 on: June 18, 2010, 11:01:40 PM »
0
I'm still a believer in that the IR-300 was likely a joint program with Iran planning on building its own TELs but the missiles would have come from Russia. Its still possible for such a system to become operation but its a bit in question.

However I find it interesting that there is news just a few days ago of Russia offering Turkey S-300/400 SAM systems.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100616/159449041.html
"I never did give anybody hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell."
- Harry Truman

Offline husseinibnali

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 448
  • Respect: +40
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #181 on: June 18, 2010, 11:38:23 PM »
0
There is no s-300 in Iran and there will never be and the IR-300 everyone talking about is the hq-9.
I would like to be surprised but guys i dont see any system except the IR-300.

Online Eagle2009

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 3550
  • Respect: +464
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #182 on: June 18, 2010, 11:51:52 PM »
0
...For the record, we've pretty much established that the IR-300 doesnt really look like the HQ-9 at all. The TEL we saw on parade actually doesnt match either the S-300 or HQ-9 (if it was a real TEL and not a Mock-up). Its a totally different truck, totally different erecting mechanism, and the accompanying radars are Russian. The only similarity between the IR-300 and the HQ-9 is the red caps on the launch tubes which is something purely cosmetic and hardly proof of anything.

Offline maiser

  • گروهبان
  • *
  • Posts: 1327
  • Respect: +65
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #183 on: June 19, 2010, 12:54:13 PM »
0
The Russians have never been reliable period

This should be a wake-up call for the people in government who thought they could use Russia as a leverage against the west.

The truth is that the Russians have been toying with Iran to get the concessions they want from the west.  In fact Russians neither like Iranians nor Muslims.  Most Russians would prefer going to Las Vegas and drink vodka with American entertainers and models than consort with Ayatollah's in Tehran.  Believe you this because I have come across many Russians in Texas.

The Russians are just looking for the interests of Russia.  Iran is not a "brother state" to them.  The best way to deal with Russians is just to steal and copy their technology through espionage and foment ties with the Central Asian Republic rebels.


Not saying all your words are untrue about this subject of relations between Iran and Russia, but i disagree with you on experiences with Russians. Your hyperbole about their behaviour and "goals" are very one-sided. Ive met plenty of Russians that have been drunk and typical Russian in behaviour, but they have more things in common with Iranians than you think. Both have been subjects of western cold/warm war and both have suffered greatly and these things should be used to better the relations between Iranians and Russians. Unfortunately, Russian leaders make that harder now with the support of divest of Iran and so on. But its by no way "over" between relations of the two nations.

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10327
  • Respect: +4645
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #184 on: June 19, 2010, 01:29:49 PM »
0
The fact that Iran is working on its own Version of S-300 (let's call it IS-300) is as evident as daylight.

I have some information as to where the technology/assistance is coming from but as for discussing the
Iran/Russia relations, as Maiser said, there will be relations between the two countries in various forms for years to come. But Iran must have received the message clearly that depending on others for defence technologies is only building in the sand and nothing else.

With the information available, I am confident Iran has already moved away from procurement from abroad and is expanding the domestic facilities substantially towards home grown defence technologies. Just wait and watch the news in the next twelve months. You will be surprised.

Catsoo

Offline DarkOmen

  • گروهبان
  • *
  • Posts: 1364
  • ca
  • Respect: +409
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #185 on: June 19, 2010, 02:29:30 PM »
0
The fact that Iran is working on its own Version of S-300 (let's call it IS-300) is as evident as daylight.

I have some information as to where the technology/assistance is coming from but as for discussing the
Iran/Russia relations, as Maiser said, there will be relations between the two countries in various forms for years to come. But Iran must have received the message clearly that depending on others for defence technologies is only building in the sand and nothing else.

With the information available, I am confident Iran has already moved away from procurement from abroad and is expanding the domestic facilities substantially towards home grown defence technologies. Just wait and watch the news in the next twelve months. You will be surprised.

Catsoo

inshallah your right catsoo. i just hope nothing in the way of a war or any type of attack takes place in the mean time.

Online 1979Change

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2739
  • ir
  • Best devotion to Allah is not to make show of it.
  • Respect: +1316
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #186 on: June 19, 2010, 07:22:43 PM »
0
...For the record, we've pretty much established that the IR-300 doesnt really look like the HQ-9 at all. The TEL we saw on parade actually doesnt match either the S-300 or HQ-9 (if it was a real TEL and not a Mock-up). Its a totally different truck, totally different erecting mechanism, and the accompanying radars are Russian. The only similarity between the IR-300 and the HQ-9 is the red caps on the launch tubes which is something purely cosmetic and hardly proof of anything.
West has always underestimated Iran when it comes to technology!!!!

Example: Enrichment They said it takes years for Iran to enrich to 20%, Iran did it in months!
Centrifuges: West said the centrifuge designs were old Pakistan designs:Iran has produced much more efficient second and third generation centrifuges by herself
West said it is impossible for Iran to build the fuel plates for Tehran research reactor: Iran made only a prototype to make a point and now will mass-produce it at the top of that Iran says it wants to build four new research reactors better and bigger than Tehran reactor, under sanction in only three years!

I think you underestimate Iran's indigenous technology and capacity.
This is not the same Iran reliant on US technology anymore!

One more thing, I think a team of top engineers from Iran can even solve Golf of Mexico problem, because we think differently than west! We are problem solvers not so much like Russians mathematician type, but like Germans problem solvers!

The problem of making a long range mobile defense system is complicated, but not so much more complicated than building a nuclear power plant!

If Iran wants to do it, she will do it, inshaallah.


Offline husseinibnali

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 448
  • Respect: +40
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #187 on: June 19, 2010, 08:52:25 PM »
0
The fact that Iran is working on its own Version of S-300 (let's call it IS-300) is as evident as daylight.

I have some information as to where the technology/assistance is coming from but as for discussing the
Iran/Russia relations, as Maiser said, there will be relations between the two countries in various forms for years to come. But Iran must have received the message clearly that depending on others for defence technologies is only building in the sand and nothing else.

With the information available, I am confident Iran has already moved away from procurement from abroad and is expanding the domestic facilities substantially towards home grown defence technologies. Just wait and watch the news in the next twelve months. You will be surprised.

Catsoo
So Catsoo do you know something we dont know?
Tell us please because we are desperate for good news in this field.

Online Eagle2009

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 3550
  • Respect: +464
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #188 on: June 19, 2010, 11:27:22 PM »
0
Katty,

 My purpose was to point out that the IR-300 looks much more like the S-300 than the HQ-9. I did say that Iran likely doesnt have the tech currently to build such a class of solid fuelled missile yet simply because we havent seen such yet and considering how long it took the Chinese I simply find it unlikely as of yet but I of course could be wrong (I often am!). But I agree Iran has the capability to do so but I am always very skeptical by nature I mean no offense to Iran's scientific achievements and I reserve final judgement to when we see it finally tested that is all, and I am sorry if I came off as condescending, it was not my intent.

Online 1979Change

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2739
  • ir
  • Best devotion to Allah is not to make show of it.
  • Respect: +1316
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #189 on: June 20, 2010, 03:26:02 AM »
0
Katty,

 My purpose was to point out that the IR-300 looks much more like the S-300 than the HQ-9. I did say that Iran likely doesnt have the tech currently to build such a class of solid fuelled missile yet simply because we havent seen such yet and considering how long it took the Chinese I simply find it unlikely as of yet but I of course could be wrong (I often am!). But I agree Iran has the capability to do so but I am always very skeptical by nature I mean no offense to Iran's scientific achievements and I reserve final judgement to when we see it finally tested that is all, and I am sorry if I came off as condescending, it was not my intent.
Regarding the copying HQ-9, it is matter of months. Iran might not be even need to go for a small scale version. Iran is not bond by any IP rights as long as the other countries do not sell the stuff Iran needs to her! Setting up molds and production lines will take 6-8 months.

Iran can produce the rockets in large scales within a year. The electronics in the rockets could be copied from the hawks and also from available infrared and/or picture processing technologies available in Iran.

The main problem is the electronics for radar and make them light and mobile. This problem is not unique to IR-300 and probably Iran has worked for years on this problem.

It is a blessing that Russia is so stupid to cancel the contract! Iran has purchased the S-300 from other countries and has probably opened them up in 2007 when the S-300 from Russia were delayed.

Anybody at these stage assuming that Iran does not have an indigenous IS-300 or IS-400 is running a high risk to pay heavily for his assumption. 

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10327
  • Respect: +4645
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #190 on: June 20, 2010, 04:32:36 AM »
0
Quote
So Catsoo do you know something we dont know?
Tell us please because we are desperate for good news in this field.

Just a little more not much!


Catsoo

Online IronHorse110

  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 7014
  • ir
  • Vahdat, Moghavemat, Ezzat
  • Respect: +2056
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #191 on: June 19, 2010, 09:32:02 PM »
0
So Catsoo do you know something we dont know?
Tell us please because we are desperate for good news in this field.

Personally i think we have the S-300 system and are going to present it as home made, at the right time and for the right political gains/reasons. It has been my hunch for awhile.

Russia is going to get concessions from the west for not giving us the S-300 ''canceling it" and voting on the sanctions, while they have all ready sold the technology to Iran 7 years ago.

Just what i think.

Also, i think they should be unveiling some modern fighter jets and drones soon. Lets wait and see.
Ya Ali, molla Ali (as)

"There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance" - Imam Ali (as)

"''melate ma neshan dade'ast ke be hadaf haye khod momen, va dar rahe on, ta nesar'e jaan eestade'ast.. chenin melati, az america va az hiiich ghodrati nemitars'ad, va be yaari'e khoda neshan khahad daad ke pirooz az on' e hagh, va momenan be hagh ast!"

- Rahbar'e moazzam'e Enghlab'e Islami Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei

Offline husseinibnali

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 448
  • Respect: +40
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #192 on: June 20, 2010, 09:36:21 AM »
0
Just a little more not much!


Catsoo

Is it something about s-300 equivelant weapons or better than that?

Offline maiser

  • گروهبان
  • *
  • Posts: 1327
  • Respect: +65
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #193 on: June 20, 2010, 11:41:48 AM »
0
Personally i think we have the S-300 system and are going to present it as home made, at the right time and for the right political gains/reasons. It has been my hunch for awhile.

Russia is going to get concessions from the west for not giving us the S-300 ''canceling it" and voting on the sanctions, while they have all ready sold the technology to Iran 7 years ago.

Just what i think.

Also, i think they should be unveiling some modern fighter jets and drones soon. Lets wait and see.

This is also a possibility. And it has happened before, with Russia and others.

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10327
  • Respect: +4645
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #194 on: June 20, 2010, 02:41:41 PM »
0
Quote
Is it something about s-300 equivelant weapons or better than that?

No comment!



catsoo

Offline husseinibnali

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 448
  • Respect: +40
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #195 on: June 20, 2010, 07:44:16 PM »
0
You overwhelmed me Catsoo! :D

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8495
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2387
DM Calls on Russia to Abide by S-300 Deal
« Reply #196 on: June 23, 2010, 09:13:43 PM »
0
DM Calls on Russia to Abide by S-300 Deal

 TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran's defense minister called on Russia to abide by an agreement signed between the two countries on the delivery of the sophisticated S-300 air defense missile system to Tehran.
   
"From our point of view, Russia is required to fulfill its undertakings," Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi said in an interview with FNA on Tuesday.

"Implementation of the contents of this contract does not run counter to Russia's internal laws, the two countries' international undertakings and international regulations," Vahidi stressed.

"We are pursuing the issue within the framework of the contract between the two sides," the Iranian minister went on saying.

He further said countries that do not abide by their deals are taken accountable for the losses incurred due to their decision, reminding that the contract terms of Iran-Russia S-300 deal include the necessary assurances for the implementation of either side's undertakings.

Vahidi also pointed out that the recently approved sanctions against Iran by the UN Security Council do not at all ban the delivery of S-300 air defense system to Iran.

The UN resolution does not specifically prohibit Russia from supplying the S-300, but Moscow has announced it was blocking the delivery of five batteries of S-300 sold to Tehran in 2007.

The Russians cited the fourth round of economic sanctions imposed on Iran by UNSC on June 9 for their decision.

Tehran has been seeking to purchase the sophisticated defense system to improve its power of deterrence in reaction to Israeli war rhetoric against Iran's nuclear facilities.

Moscow signed a contract with Tehran in 2007 to supply the powerful S-300 missiles to Iran.

The S-300 surface-to-air system, known as the SA-20 in the West, can track targets and fire at aircraft 120 kilometers (75 miles) away. It also features high jamming immunity and is capable of simultaneously engaging up to 100 targets.

http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8904011639

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8495
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2387
MP: Delay in Delivery of S-300 Missiles to Iran Impairs Russia's Face
« Reply #197 on: June 24, 2010, 02:09:49 PM »
0
MP: Delay in Delivery of S-300 Missiles to Iran Impairs Russia's Face

 TEHRAN (FNA)- Any delay in the delivery of the sophisticated S-300 air defense missile system to Tehran will impair Russia's face and will make it difficult for Moscow to find new trade partners in the world, an Iranian legislator warned.
   
Head of Iran-Russia Parliamentary Friendship Committee Mehdi Sanae'i elaborated on the agreement between the two countries, signed in 2005, arguing that Russia's delay in the delivery of the S-300 air-defense missiles to Tehran is resulted from outside pressure.

"The delivery of S-300 missile defense system to Iran is part of Moscow's definite obligation and no excuse to dodge the responsibility is acceptable," Sanae'i told MNA.

"Moscow's failure to deliver the air-defense missile system to Tehran would not only hinder cooperation between the two states, but also damage the country's status in finding new partners in the region," Sanae'i maintained.

His remarks came on the same day Iran's defense minister called on Russia to abide by an agreement signed between the two countries on the delivery of the sophisticated S-300 air defense missile system to Tehran.

Vahidi's remarks came in reaction to the comments of Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Andrei Denisov, who announced last week that Russia had decided to freeze the delivery of the missiles to Iran, as it was against the new round of UN sanctions on Tehran approved on June 9.

"Moscow believes that the sanctions resolution clearly forbids the sale of the S-300 system to Iran," Denisov said.

Vahidi also pointed out that the recently approved sanctions against Iran by the UN Security Council do not at all ban the delivery of S-300 air defense system to Iran.

The UN resolution does not specifically prohibit Russia from supplying the S-300, but Moscow has announced it was blocking the delivery of five batteries of S-300 sold to Tehran in 2007.

The Russians cited the fourth round of economic sanctions imposed on Iran by UNSC on June 9 for their decision.

Tehran has been seeking to purchase the sophisticated defense system to improve its power of deterrence in reaction to Israeli war rhetoric against Iran's nuclear facilities.

Moscow signed a contract with Tehran in 2007 to supply the powerful S-300 missiles to Iran.

The S-300 surface-to-air system, known as the SA-20 in the West, can track targets and fire at aircraft 120 kilometers (75 miles) away. It also features high jamming immunity and is capable of simultaneously engaging up to 100 targets.

http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8904030461

Offline wasti

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Respect: +3
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #198 on: June 25, 2010, 03:07:12 PM »
0
I HAVE ONLY ONE QUESTION TO ALL READERS OF THIS FORUM.

WHY IRAN IS SO COMPELLED TO BUY S-300 FROM COWARD RUSSIA.DOESN'T IRAN POSSESS THE CAPABILITY TO BUILD A NEW AIR DEFENSE OF ITS OWN?

ONCE PAKISTANI PRIME MINISTER BHUTTO PROMISED TO BUILD NUCLEAR BOMB TO COMPETE WITH IT'S ARCH RIVAL INDIA EVEN BY EATING GRASS !!!! HE KEPT HIS PROMISE AND MADE PAKISTAN A NUCLEAR POWERED COUNTRY.

SO WHERE DOES THE PROBLEM LIES IN IRAN?WHY CAN'T THEY MAKE A VERY GOOD MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM?

WHO HELPED RUSSIA TO BUILD S-300?THEY MADE IT ON THEIR OWN.WHO HELPED U.S.A TO BUILD F-35 OR PATRIOT MISSILE?THEY USED THEIR INGENUITY TO BUILD THESE WEAPONS.

CAN ANYBODY EXPLAIN WHY IRAN CAN'T BUILD A S-300 OF IT'S OWN?     

WILL IRAN EVER BE ABLE TO BUILD A GOOD FIGHTER AND A GOOD AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM AS WELL?     

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8495
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2387
S-300 delivery news
« Reply #199 on: June 25, 2010, 03:34:39 PM »
0
wasti, don't write using uppercase text.

I HAVE ONLY ONE QUESTION TO ALL READERS OF THIS FORUM.

WHY IRAN IS SO COMPELLED TO BUY S-300 FROM COWARD RUSSIA.DOESN'T IRAN POSSESS THE CAPABILITY TO BUILD A NEW AIR DEFENSE OF ITS OWN?
Iran makes its own air defense system and we are well covered for in the short to medium range radius. However, the S-300/400 systems are long range air defense systems that are unchallenged in the world by any other air defense system.

Quote
ONCE PAKISTANI PRIME MINISTER BHUTTO PROMISED TO BUILD NUCLEAR BOMB TO COMPETE WITH IT'S ARCH RIVAL INDIA EVEN BY EATING GRASS !!!! HE KEPT HIS PROMISE AND MADE PAKISTAN A NUCLEAR POWERED COUNTRY.
Unfortunately this is what is happening today in Pakistan. A prime minister saying such a thing should be fired from his post and be considered a disgrace. In Iran if a minister ever says weapons are more important than the people having food, he can hand in his resignation the next day. The question of whether it really brought deterrence capability to Pakistan is still open for debate.

Quote
SO WHERE DOES THE PROBLEM LIES IN IRAN?WHY CAN'T THEY MAKE A VERY GOOD MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM?
Developing a defensive missile system paralleled to capabilities of the S-300 requires decades of R&D. However, Iran is getting there.

Quote
WHO HELPED RUSSIA TO BUILD S-300?THEY MADE IT ON THEIR OWN.WHO HELPED U.S.A TO BUILD F-35 OR PATRIOT MISSILE?THEY USED THEIR INGENUITY TO BUILD THESE WEAPONS.
Well, indirectly it was German engineers in both the cases. They lay the foundations of missile/rocket and aircraft technology in both countries. Among many other technologies and sciences.

Quote
     CAN ANYBODY EXPLAIN WHY IRAN CAN'T BUILD A S-300 OF IT'S OWN?
You're repeating the same question over and over again.

Quote
WILL IRAN EVER BE ABLE TO BUILD A GOOD FIGHTER AND A GOOD AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM AS WELL?
It is already building better than good air defense systems and fighters. In time they will become better if God wills.

 

SMF 2.0.4 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Page created in 1.494 seconds with 26 queries.