Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: New Claims: Saeqeh capable launch PGM and radar guided, heat seeking missiles  (Read 4574 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Numbers

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • au
  • Respect: +23
    • World News
0
Now if new version of SA is low RCS. In couple of years. Then you will not need as many. A superiority of 5 : 1 would most probably kill all those bastards.

F-35 costs 150 million dollars.
(Let's assume that) Future Stealth Aircraft X costs 30 million dollars.

1 F-35 = 5 Future Stealth Aircraft X.

and you only need 1 F-35 versus 2 Future Stealth Aircraft X (since both aircrafts are equal as Stealth Aircrafts).

Cost of program 2 x 600 x 30 = 36 billion dollars. Affordable.

The question is how much Future Stealth Aircraft X will really costs?
                            ^^^^^^ ?

I agree. It is most important to build cheap Future Stealth Aircraft X to counter US F-35.
Well, unless you can get long range SAM like S-300 (that can see Stealth F-35).
« Last Edit: October 07, 2011, 08:17:44 AM by Numbers »

Offline nomad

  • سرباز یكم
  • *
  • Posts: 598
  • gb
  • NON SEQUITUR
  • Respect: +2
0
Yes you all got good points there . It is a question of numbers ( USD !! ) . Someone said before it's worth waiting maybe 5~10 years to get new engine and then build plane . I think it is better to have many plan . Lets call it plan A , plan B and plan C .
Lets also say we are not completely sure which plan will work well . Plan A = build SA fighter in present configuration  upto maximum number of say 3000 ( in six years time ) , this gives 5 :1 superiority against all carrier based aircraft . Plan B is to research into building SA fighter from start as a stealth plane and also convert old SA into stealth plane . Plan C is to build new plane with new engine when and if available with stealth capability .

We know plan A is almost certain to work against F-18 . However this force need to be supplemented with some high altitude planes to compensate for low ceiling of SA fighters . We assume plan B to be 50-50 likely to succeed , because Iran only recently managed to start making nano products and started programme of stealth conversion  and coverings . Plan C we can say may have 30% chance of success . Or at least lower expectation . It is probable that new engines may not work or be developed .

And I think the budget allow for all this to be done . We should certainly follow plan A and also plan B and C . Even if plan B and C may not work , we have plan A that we know will work for at least near future ( 5~10 ) years . But if we wait and allow indicision and inertia and false expectation to rule , and keep production level of SA fighter very low at 2 units per year then it may be too late to buy Russian when shooting start and the Russians may also want to carve up the spoils and side with the Yank .
Error is inconsistent with my prime function .

Offline Numbers

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • au
  • Respect: +23
    • World News
0
I would wait for plan B only. You can not have plan A. It will cost you 840 billion dollars (as counted by aryana).
« Last Edit: October 07, 2011, 09:15:21 AM by Numbers »

Offline nomad

  • سرباز یكم
  • *
  • Posts: 598
  • gb
  • NON SEQUITUR
  • Respect: +2
0
Yes Aryana is right if it truly cost 15 Million (USD ) for SA fighter and it needs a 70 : 1 superiority against F35 and it is likely to come mostly across F35 in next 2~5 years in large numbers ( all 10 carriers equipped with it ) . And yes I agree you are right if Iran is 100% sure of making SA fighter stealth from ground up and if this will not cost more than 30 Million each and if this can happen within the next 2~5 years and if against F-18 or F35 it only need a superiority of  2 : 1 . And I am right if we are not sure ( less than 80% chance ) of a stealth plane within next 2~5 years and if  F-35 will not be deployed in large numbers in the next 2~5 years and if the main problem is 600 F-18 and if SA can  be made for ~2  million and if 600 SA can be made each year and a superiority of more than 2 : 1  is needed against mostly F-18 .

If for instance the chance of making a stealth plane is taken roughly equal to deploying advanced chaff and ecm ( Advanced chaff and ecm require roughly the same advances in technology in the same area as stealth plane . IE : electronics and materials ) and as you said the chance is good to high in near to moderate term . AND if the use of chaff and ecm roughly gives the same advantage as stealth THEN it makes more sense not to take any chance ( even if this is small ) with not having adequate air cover in the next 2~5 years , when non-stealth planes can become virtually stealth and they are likely to face non stealth planes . Also SA built now has just as much chance of stealth modification in the future . ( equal chance of developing stealth material and stealth coverings - same technology ) .

If the chance of attack in the next 2~5 years was low then why rush , I agree . If iran was Turkey or Malaysia . But Syria may be 6 months and Iran two years down the line . ( I think this is realistic ) . :think:
« Last Edit: October 07, 2011, 11:58:41 AM by nomad »

Offline Numbers

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • au
  • Respect: +23
    • World News
0
If for instance the chance of making a stealth plane is taken roughly equal to deploying advanced chaff and ecm (Advanced chaff and ecm require roughly the same advances in technology in the same area as stealth plane. IE: electronics and materials) and as you said the chance is good to high in near to moderate term. AND if the use of chaff and ecm roughly gives the same advantage as stealth THEN it makes more sense not to take any chance (even if this is small) with not having adequate air cover in the next 2~5 years, when non-stealth planes can become virtually stealth and they are likely to face non stealth planes.

The use of chaff is not equal to Stealth. Chaff does not have engine (Chaff speed = 0) so can be filtered out by F-35 Radar.

So Chaff can only be used to redirect incoming Radar Guided missile. Chaff is defensive measure only. You can not use Chaff to approach F-35 at 35 kilometers to launch IR guided missile (like US Sidewinder) from Saeqeh.

The best option is to design Iranian Stealth Aircraft. It has to be cheap (30 million Euros), light weight (smaller engines, less fuel, smaller Radar, lesser number of missiles) and therefore fast. Stealth Aircraft role will be Light Tactical Bomber/Interceptor.

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5545
  • Respect: +310
0
Quote
Those images prove at the very least Iran can build a APQ-153 from scratch, we have no such evidence they have done the same with the APQ-159, paritially because we aren't even sure any Iranian F-5Es were delivered with that radar. If not, then the claims in the 90's of Iran expanding their F-5Es radar range to 64km a little suspect. If they did receive F-5Es with the -159 than that claim is quite possible. We just don't know for sure, the only evidence of Iran improving the F-5E's radar is those images of Iranian-built APQ-153 components.

Eagle,

I know from credible sources that Iran increased its F-4 radar range way back during the war time. I believe the range was increased to impressive range. Now, I did not know much about radars then and or do I now but the conclusion I can mke is that increasing the range of F-5 radar for Iran, w/o talking specifics, is true and completely withing its capabilities.


Catsoo

Online nelsa

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: +11
0
Quote
iran does not have 500 billion dollar reserves. and usa is going to have more than 600 f-35s.
besides f-5 is going to cost more than 5 million for iran to develop and produce  like 3 times more at least.

so its like that, 800*70*15 thats 840 billion dollars.
Do you know what are you talking,one thing is how much warcraft USA have and other thing is how mach aircraft they can deploy on front line,i can't bealive you can understand one thing,Iran will deafend himself and USA will atack,they must fight against aircraft +airdeafence+antiship missle+asimetric wf....,i can tell you call douty,batlefield..etc are good games but only a games,i am from Bosnia and we fight against 4-th military power in the Europe JNA and thrust me i know what i am talking about.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2011, 03:59:22 PM by nelsa »

Offline omedAFG

  • سرباز عادى
  • *
  • Posts: 108
  • au
  • Respect: +7
0
how many saqehs are there in the iranian inventory as of now?
Afghanistan- where empires go to die. -Mike Malloy

Offline Numbers

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • au
  • Respect: +23
    • World News
0
Plan B is to research into building SA fighter from start as a stealth plane and also convert old SA into stealth plane . Plan C is to build new plane with new engine when and if available with stealth capability .

The best option is to develop Saeqeh plane as Light Stealth Interceptor (plan B). With lighter weight than F-35 and cheaper in price. Say around 30 million USD for 1 Light Stealth Interceptor.

Plastic Chassis Stealth Technology can be developed. For example multi-layered Plastic Panel can reflect Radar Beam to the sides of plane.

Saeqeh's Engine and Radar already exist. The only additional task is to develop Stealth Chassis for Saeqeh. Which can be done.

 

SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Page created in 1.18 seconds with 23 queries.