0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
/ Air Defences / Iran Military Downs US Spy Drone (Read 33134 times) back 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 16 next
Posts: 8074
Vahdat, Moghavemat, Ezzat
*
ir
Colonel (سرهنگ)
The world is going to be surprised and caught completely off-guard if they ever decide to attack the Islamic Republic. They have no clue what Iran is capable of and are in absolute shock that their super stealth UAV was taken so easily.
Ya Ali, molla Ali (as)

"There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance" - Imam Ali (as)

"''melate ma neshan dade'ast ke be hadaf haye khod momen, va dar rahe on, ta nesar'e jaan eestade'ast.. chenin melati, az america va az hiiich ghodrati nemitars'ad, va be yaari'e khoda neshan khahad daad ke pirooz az on' e hagh, va momenan be hagh ast!"

- Rahbar'e moazzam'e Enghlab'e Islami Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei

Logged
0
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)
Posts: 850
*
ir
Corporal (سرجوخه)
Ordinary Event !


Iran has access to major U.S. military secrets, and this guy calls it an ordinary event.

Maybe flying drones over Iran is an ordinary event, but the capture of a drone is not any ordinary event.

But the title of the article includes the words, "So What If Iran Has A U.S. Drone?"

But the article does not address that. It only talks about spying with drones to be an ordinary event. That is not even a clever bit of deception.

The U.S. is trying to make light of the situation. That dishonesty from the USA is an ordinary event.

Pathetic, but ordinary.

Then Zenko goes on to say, "Iran also flies surveillance drones against U.S. military assets, as demonstrated in this grainy video of the USS Ronald Reagan."

The USS Ronald Reagan was in international waters. The Iranian drone did not spy on US territory. Zenko's argument is specious and disingenuous.

Last Edit: December 13, 2011, 04:57:45 PM by Mr-Babak-S

Logged
0
Posts: 3591
*
ir
Lieutenant colonel (سرهنگ دوم)
Quote
سفر جلیلی به مسکو ارتباطی با پهپاد آمریکا ندارد
خبرگزاری ایرنا - ساعت 12:49 - 22/9/1390
تهران- سخنگوي وزارت امور خارجه تاکيد کرد: سفر اخير 'سعيد جليلي' دبير شوراي عالي امنيت ملي کشورمان به مسکو هيچگونه ارتباطي با هواپيماي بدون سرنشين (پهپاد) جاسوسي آمريکا ندارد.

به گزارش خبرنگار سیاسی ایرنا، 'رامین مهمانپرست' این سخنان را در نشست خبری امروز (سه شنبه) خود در پاسخ به سوال خبرنگاری در رابطه با سفر جلیلی به مسکو و گزارش های رسانه ای درباره تمایل روسیه به داشتن اطلاعات پهپاد آمریکایی مطرح کرد.
رییس مرکز دیپلماسی عمومی وزارت امور خارجه ضمن رد این موضوع گفت: تبادل نظر و رایزنی میان مقامات کشورهای بزرگی مانند ایران و روسیه کاملا طبیعی است.
سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه افزود: با توجه به نقش ایران در منطقه و جایگاه روسیه در سطح جهانی و روابط دیرینه و راهبردی دو طرف انجام این گونه سفرها در سطوح بالا و رایزنی های مختلف کاملا طبیعی است و این موضوع ارتباطی با هواپیمای جاسوسی آمریکایی ها ندارد.

** اهمیت رایزنی تهران و ریاض
مهمانپرست در پاسخ به سوال ایرنا در رابطه با سفر حجت الاسلام و المسلمین 'حیدر مصلحی' وزیر اطلاعات کشورمان به عربستان سعودی و مذاکره وی با ولیعهد این کشور گفت: امیدواریم این سفر و نتایج مفیدی در روابط دو جانبه و مسایل منطقه ای داشته باشد.
وی یادآور شد: جمهوری اسلامی ایران و عربستان سعودی دو کشور مهم منطقه هستند و نقش و تاثیر فراوانی در جهان اسلام دارند.
رییس مرکز دیپلماسی عمومی وزارت امور خارجه گفت: وجود چنین تماس ها و رایزنی هایی به رفع سوء تفاهمات و موضوعات سیاسی و امنیتی دو جانبه و منطقه ای کمک می کند.
وی با یادآوری شرایط حساس کنونی در منطقه و همچنین تلاش های سلطه گران جهانی در خاورمیانه افزود: باید با هوش و درایت، اجازه ایجاد اختلاف میان کشورهای منطقه را ندهیم تا بتوانیم سوء تفاهمات موجود را رفع کنیم.
سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه تاکید کرد: ایجاد اختلاف در میان کشورهای منطقه تنها به نفع رژیم صهیونیستی و حامیان آن است.
ادامه دارد

http://news.veyq.ir/news/328595/%D9%85%D9%87%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%BE%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C-2-%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%B1-%D8%AC%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%B3%DA%A9%D9%88-%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%D9%BE%D9%87%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A2%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%DA%A9%D8%A7-%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AF



Quote
تذکر جزایری به نمایندگان مجلس و رسانه ها؛
در انتشار اخبار دفاعی خویشتن دار باشید/ هیچ یک از اظهارات درباره RQ-170 مورد تائید نیست
معاون فرهنگی و تبلیغات دفاعی ستادکل نیروهای مسلح با بیان اینکه هیچ یک از اخبار منتشر شده پیرامون RQ-170 مورد تائید نیست، گفت: نمایندگان مجلس و رسانه ها در انتشار اخبار دفاعی خویشتن دار باشند.
سردار سید مسعود جزایری معاون فرهنگی و تبلیغات دفاعی ستادكل نیروهای مسلح در گفت‌وگو با خبرنگار دفاعی مشرق با اشاره به انتشار برخی اخبار و اظهارنظر ها درباره پهپاد آمریکایی جاسوسی به غنیمت گرفته شده RQ-170 توسط جمهوری اسلامی، گفت: هیچ یک از این اظهار نظرها در این باره مورد تائید نیست.

وی ادامه داد: متاسفانه درمورد اخبار دفاعی عده ای بدون داشتن اطلاعات کافی و یا تخصص لازم، در این زمینه اظهار نظر می کنند؛ چه بسا این اظهارات پیامدهای منفی را نیز برای امنیت ملی به همراه داشته باشد.

معاون فرهنگی و تبلیغات دفاعی ستادکل نیروهای مسلح افزود: بر اساس قوانین و مقررات اینگونه اظهارنظرها پیامدهای حقوقی برای گوینده و منتشر کننده به دنبال خواهد داشت.

وی به ویژه از نمایندگان محترم مجلس درخواست کرد نسبت به نقل اخبار دفاعی در رسانه ها خویشتن دار باشند و اظهارنظرهای خود را با ستادکل نیروهای مسلح هماهنگ کنند.

سردار جزایری در انتها خطاب به رسانه های داخلی، گفت: مراقب باشید در مسابقه خبری منافع ملی کشور خدشه دار نشود.

http://www.mashreghnews.ir/fa/news/84635/%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AF%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D8%AE%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B4%D8%AA%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%87%DB%8C%DA%86-%DB%8C%DA%A9-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%A7%D8%B8%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-rq170-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A6%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA

Logged
0
Posts: 755
*
Corporal (سرجوخه)

جناب نپتون یکی از دوستان کمی اشاره کردن که چجوری میشه یه هواپیمای بی سرنشین رو هک کرد ولی من بیشتر توضیح میدم .
یکی از راه ها اینه که برای مدتی هواپیما رو تحت نظر بگیرین و هر دستوری که از ماهواره برای اون ارسال میشه(پهبادهای امریکایی مثل همین مدل و پردیتور و ریپر ماهواره ای کنترل میشن نه کنترل زمینی یا هوایی) ضبط و عکس العمل هواگرد رو هم بررسی کنید در این حالت بعد از مدتی نیاز به کدگشایی هم ندارین دقیقا می دونید که چه پالس هایی با چه فرکانسی و چه طول موجی بفرستین که هواپیما ارتفاع کم زیاد به چپ یا راست بگرده وبا همین روش میشه تمام دستورات اون رو کشف کرد.

در عین حال شما چون روی زمین امکانات اخلال قویتری از ماهواره دارین به راحتی می تونین امواج قویتری بفرستین و به راحتی هواگرد رو متاثر کنین و یا حتی اگر انتن های اون جهت دار باشه با استفاده از هواگردهای اخلالگر این کار رو بکنین مثلا فرض کنین یه هواپیمای سی۱۳۰ یا ایران ۱۴۰ برای این کار آماده شده باشه در این حالت چون از بالا میشه اون رو مختل کرد و قدرت امواج قویتر هست به راحتی میشه دستورات مشابه فرستاد و به طور کامل هدایت اون رو در دست گرفت .

برای جلوگیری از شروع به کار سیستم خودانتهاری هم میتونید در زمانی که هیچ دستوری ارسال نمی کنید کل باندهای ارسال و دریافت هواگرد رو جم کنین که سیستم اصلی دشمن نتونه کد خودانتهاری رو ارسال کنه.در این حالت سیستم کامل در دست شما هست و دشمن هم نمی تونه هیچ کاری بکنه مگر اینکه در همون زمان در منطقه سیستم های مشابه شما ولی قویتر داشته باشه که این مورد نشدنی هست زیرا خبر نداره شما کجا و به چه شکلی می خواین این کار رو بکنین .در عین حال اصلا خبر نداره که شما می خواین این کار رو بکنین.

این یه روش بود .
روش دیگه دقیقا هک هست و اونم به این وسیله که دریافت اطلاعات و ارسال اطلاعات پهباد رو دریافت و سپس ارتباط بین اعمال پهباد و ارتباطات رو کشف کنین این کار هم توسط متخصصین رمز گذاری انجام میشه نه مهندس نرم افزار یا گرایش هوش مصنوعی رایانه که شما ادعا کنین بهش وارد هستین و این مورد رمزگشایی در شاخصه ریاضی خودش گرایش و متخصص داره و اتفاقا تا جایی که من خبر دارم در این مورد بسیار قوی هستیم.
در ضمن هوش مصنوعی ارتباط خاصی به سیستم هک یا دی هک نداره و استفادش در سیستم های اتوپایلوت هست وگرنه در هک برنامه نویسی هوش مصنوعی موضوعیت نداره.
بعد از رمزگشایی مدتی دوباره سیستم رو کنترل می کنین تا ببینین که نتایج درست هست یا نه و در صورت درستی یعنی کار به اتمام رسیده و شما می تونید هدایت هواگرد رو در اختیار بگیرین.

اما روش بعدی استفاده از اخلالگرهای جی پی اس هست که معذرت می خوام ببخشید گلاب به روتون توی ایران مثل پشکل ریخته فقط یه کار می خواد و اون اینکه اینقدر قوی باشن که بتونن آنتن هواگرد رو متاثر کنن یا باید اون رو روی هواگردهایی مثل سی ۱۳۰ سوار کنین در این حالت با این روشی که بنده در زیر عرض می کنم میشه به راحتی هواگرد رو مجبور به فرود کرد.
شما کافی هست که مختصات خودتون رو به این هواگرد و آنتن جی پی اس اون القا کنین(چند وقت پیش خبر گذشتن ایران از این فناوری و رسیدن به فناوری القا و هدایت موشک های دشمن پخش شد) با این کار بدون اینکه خود هواگرد بدونه می تونید وارد فضای کشورش کنید و بعد با القا ارتفاع بالاتر و بالاتر سیستم اتوپایلوت هواگرد سعی در تثبیت ارتفاع روی عدد خاصی می کنه و چون ارتفاع القایی شما خیلی بالاتر هست هی ارتفاع رو کم می کنه تا جایی که شما می خواین بعد شما مختصات یه زمین هموار یا حتی فرودگاه رو بهش القا می کنین در این حالت خودش عین کفتر جلد میاد روی باند و در این حالت می تونید به رادار تعبیه شده در دماغه فقط یه مانع القا کنین(البته همه از این نوع رادار ندارن) و اگر رادار رماغه برای شناسایی عوارش روبروش نداشت باز فرقی نمی کنه شما تورهای مهار هواپیمای باند رو فعال می کنین و هواگرد با اندکی خسارت گرفتار میشه و بعد از این کار تمام باندهای دریافت و ارسال رو مختل می کنین تا دمشن توان فعال نمودن سیستم خودانهدامی اون رو از دست بده و خود هواگرد و خلبان اتوماتیک اون هم اصلا نمی فهمه چی سرش اومده.
نهایتا اگر مختصات القایی شما تا آخرین لحظه مختصات فرودگاه مبدا باشه هواگرد حتی خودش هم سیستم رو فعال نمی کنه چون منطقه خطر رو تشخیص نمیده.

اگر تور هم نداشتین باز عیبی نداره ارتفاع رو اینقدر اروم کم می کنین تا هواگرد به ارامی به زمین برسه و به باند یا زمین بماله در این حالت ممکنه ملغ هم بزنه ولی نهایتا خواهد ایستاد .
در این مورد هم باید همزمان تمام باندهای ارسال و دریافت در حال جم باشن و مختصات فرودگاه مبدا رو القا کنین در این حالت باز هواگرد با کمی خسارت در اختیار شما خواهد بود.

با توجه به اینکه گفته شده هواگرد زیاد وارد فضای کشور نشده من حدث می زنم از این روش استفاده شده باشه و امریکاییها هم فهمیدن هواگردشون داره به طرف ایران میره و نمی تونن کنترلش کنن چون تمام باندهاشون جم شده بوده.
این احتمالا یه نقشه طراحی شده از قبل بوده.برای همین غافلگیری کامل به همراه داشته و دشمن نتونسته کاری بکنه.
بعد از فرود هواگرد هم مهندسین سراغش رفتن و سوخت و مواد منفجره رو خارج کردن و بعد با خیال راحت منتقلش کردن به جایی امن

Logged
0
Posts: 3011
*
ir
Major (سرگرد)
Of the three methods, I can see the first (navigation signal imitation) and third (GPS imitation) which is sufficient.  The second (live decryption) still doesn't make sense.  There is a possible 4th option that comes to mind, which is actually intercepting and netting the UAV in the air (is this possible-if not why?).  I can also see why self-destruct was inhibited as the author describes.

Regardless, after thinking about it over the past few days I had already imagined the first and third (and of course 4th) options.  The second option (again, on the fly decryption of signals) still doesn't make sense to me.  But it doesn't matter, because the other options seem to work--assuming these conditions weren't imagined by Lockheed/DOD and a solution wasn't in place which is very possible.

At the end, the craft is virtually undamaged and in IRI's hands which points, almost indisputably, to a take over and a controlled landing one way or another.

Mamdali.
(Note:  I hope I'm being redundant by saying that given the state of misinformation and factless and unsupported content that is rife on the 'internet' today, naturally, I cannot endorse, believe, support, or accept any of links posted by me or others.  I personally find them interesting, however, as they open new perspectives for me.  I leave it to the reader to glean what they can or want from them).
Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 02:48:00 AM by mamdali

Logged
0
Posts: 299
*
us
Private (سرباز عادى)
The world is going to be surprised and caught completely off-guard if they ever decide to attack the Islamic Republic. They have no clue what Iran is capable of and are in absolute shock that their super stealth UAV was taken so easily.

No proof the UAV was 'taken' unless one supposes the Iranians took control of the aircraft which is silly. Jamming communications and GPS also won't bring down the UAV BUT for arguments sake if the satcom/GPS was jammed and as a result the aircraft fell out of the sky(INS guidance aside), the damage would be equal to a technical failure because in both cases there would be loss in controls.

This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Logged
0
Posts: 254
*
Private (سرباز عادى)
Nightstrike, or should I call you "drone-that-induced-your-nightmare", believe what you want. At the end of the day, Iran has the DRONE, a HUGE CATCH, and your masters hich ghalati nemeetone ke bekone.   

Logged
0
Posts: 3011
*
ir
Major (سرگرد)
.....
This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.

'Beh roobah goftan shahedet keeyeh, goft dombam'...:)

Mamdali
(Note:  I hope I'm being redundant by saying that given the state of misinformation and factless and unsupported content that is rife on the 'internet' today, naturally, I cannot endorse, believe, support, or accept any of links posted by me or others.  I personally find them interesting, however, as they open new perspectives for me.  I leave it to the reader to glean what they can or want from them).

Logged
0
Posts: 3638
*
ir
Lieutenant colonel (سرهنگ دوم)
No proof the UAV was 'taken' unless one supposes the Iranians took control of the aircraft which is silly. Jamming communications and GPS also won't bring down the UAV BUT for arguments sake if the satcom/GPS was jammed and as a result the aircraft fell out of the sky(INS guidance aside), the damage would be equal to a technical failure because in both cases there would be loss in controls.

This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.
so if this hypothesis is silly to you then I guess the hypothesis of the plane losing control and crashing and still being in one piece, or the plane landing itself in hostile territory,  is not Silly to you!!  Your sense of logic is extra-terrestrial
"You will never achieve righteousness until you give away (in the way of God) what you love the most" Quran 3:92
The wisdom in this verse is used in star wars:
"Train yourself to let go of everything you fear to lose, for the fear of loss is the path to the dark side"- Master Yoda advising young Anakin.

Logged
0
Posts: 2502
كونا للظالم خصماً وللمظلوم عوناً
*
lb
Captain (سروان)
No proof the UAV was 'taken' unless one supposes the Iranians took control of the aircraft which is silly. Jamming communications and GPS also won't bring down the UAV BUT for arguments sake if the satcom/GPS was jammed and as a result the aircraft fell out of the sky(INS guidance aside), the damage would be equal to a technical failure because in both cases there would be loss in controls.

This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Ok. You will not get it back.

Logged
0
Posts: 9299
Defender of Justice
*
ir
2nd Brig. general (سرتیب دوم)
The encryption on these devices for any information it receives or sends, can not be that heavy to break. The heavier the encryption, the more energy it requires to encrypt and decrypt everything. I read someone that they use a continues signal to the UAV. This would require a lot of energy, however assuming this is done... without knowing how this device works, I would attempt to force a disconnect by basically attempting a high amount of fake logins. That might cause a disconnect. While doing this, I would also be sniffing the air for connection attempts and catch the packet that makes a connection with the device. Once I have that packet, I would put all the computer available to me to crack it using rainbowtables.

In fact, I've cracked wireless networks doing (something similar to) the above. The only thing I see as more "difficult" is the assumed longer password they might use. However, having the supercomputers Iran has, I would put them all in a network and use pre-made rainbow tables to get through it fast.

Logged
0
Posts: 6473
*
Colonel (سرهنگ)
Quote
No proof the UAV was 'taken' unless one supposes the Iranians took control of the aircraft which is silly. Jamming communications and GPS also won't bring down the UAV BUT for arguments sake if the satcom/GPS was jammed and as a result the aircraft fell out of the sky(INS guidance aside), the damage would be equal to a technical failure because in both cases there would be loss in controls.

This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.


With this kind of thinking, is it any wonder the US is going down the drain??? Three more people like you and the US will be finished in no time...


Quote
This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Finding the word "congressional" and "intelligence" in the same sentence makes me wanna throw up...As if it's intelligence, in the true sense of the word, that guides the US decision makers or decision making process..It's like the Pentagon favourite word "Military Intelligence"..An oxymoron, one would say..

With people like you and this pattern of thinking, is it any wonder the leaders in the West always get away with murder and destruction of their economy??

Believe whatever you want..Fact is, the drone is now in Iran's possession - even the dumb president Obama confirms it and "has asked for it back..." - without the shame, of course.


Read a bit of history and see where imperial hubris and stupidity ended all the previous super powers(empire)...
But then again, why do I have to bother you with reading,something that's discouraged and frowned upon in the US and substituted with TV and American idols...lol
Last Edit: December 14, 2011, 08:27:06 AM by reza18

Logged
0
Posts: 755
*
Corporal (سرجوخه)
No proof the UAV was 'taken' unless one supposes the Iranians took control of the aircraft which is silly. Jamming communications and GPS also won't bring down the UAV BUT for arguments sake if the satcom/GPS was jammed and as a result the aircraft fell out of the sky(INS guidance aside), the damage would be equal to a technical failure because in both cases there would be loss in controls.

This was confirmed today by one of the congressional intelligence committee, and I see no reason to believe otherwise.

it is not just jamming the gps signal but induving the landing coordinates to it.

Logged
0
Posts: 8074
Vahdat, Moghavemat, Ezzat
*
ir
Colonel (سرهنگ)
LOL Congressional INTELLIGENCE. HAHAHAHA

If they had an iota of intelligence they wouldn't bankrupt their country running around like a chicken with its head cut off.

Bottom line is, Iran hacked into and took over the controls of the UAV. They have demonstrated it with live video feed in Iraq and Lebanon. The congressional intelligence should first do an IQ test to see if they are even as capable as a donkey, who is retarded, and prematurely born.
Ya Ali, molla Ali (as)

"There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance" - Imam Ali (as)

"''melate ma neshan dade'ast ke be hadaf haye khod momen, va dar rahe on, ta nesar'e jaan eestade'ast.. chenin melati, az america va az hiiich ghodrati nemitars'ad, va be yaari'e khoda neshan khahad daad ke pirooz az on' e hagh, va momenan be hagh ast!"

- Rahbar'e moazzam'e Enghlab'e Islami Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei

Logged
0
Posts: 755
*
Corporal (سرجوخه)
1- آیا واقعا فکر می کنید اوباما و آمریکایی ها اونقدر احمقند که یه همچین درخواست احمقانه ای از ایران داشته باشن؟ یا شاید در مقابلش پشنهاد معامله ای به ایران دادن که اوباما اینگونه میاد در یک کنفرانس مطبوعاتی می گه ما منتظر پاسخ ایرانیم.

بعید میدونم، اوباما اینقدر احمق باشه که بخواد با همچین درخواستی و بیان این صحبت ها در کنفرانس مطبوعاتی خودشو مضحکه رسانه ها کنه.

2- خبر بی سر و صدای سفر جلیلی به روسیه رو داشتیم که گفته شد یکی از موضوعات بحث در رابطه با تجاوز پهپاد آمریکایی هست

3- اعلام آماده باش غیر منتظره هو جین تائو به نیروی دریایی برای آمادگی برای نبرد.

4- خبر EUtimes درباره اعلام پوتین و مدودف مبنی بر اعلام موافقت اصولی هو جین تائو مبنی بر ورود به جنگ (حتی هسته ای) با غرب به منظور ممانعت از تهاجم اخیر غرب ( در مورد سوریه و ایران و احتمالا بعدش هم لابد ...)

5- ضرب و شتم سفیر روسیه در قطر که گفته میشه به در خواست CIA و MI6 بوده مبنی بر دستیابی یک سری اطلاعاتی که سفیر روسیه در بازگشت از سوریه همراه خودش در کیفش داشته

6- این بحث سلاح بیولوژیک آنفولانزای مصنوعی که گفته میشده قصد داشتن در سوریه و ایران به کار ببرن و برای اینکار هم از Rq-170 قرار بوده استفاده بشه

7- سفر غیر منتظره وزیر اطلاعات به عربستان

Logged
0
Posts: 204
*
au
Private (سرباز عادى)
im just wondering where is Eagle on this hot topic? sorry i know its unrelated, thanks.

Logged
0
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)
'Iran UAVs to outmaneuver US drones'

Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:45AM GMT

A member of Iran's Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy Parviz Sorouri
Iran plans to carry out reverse engineering on an American spy drone downed by the Iranian military and mass-produce aircraft that can outmaneuver US unmanned aerial vehicles, an Iranian lawmaker says.


Iran will carry out reverse engineering on the captured RQ-170 Sentinel stealth aircraft at the next step, member of the Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy Parviz Sorouri said on Sunday.

Iranian engineers will prove that they have the essential capabilities to mass-produce aircraft of higher quality than US drones in the near future, IRIB quoted the legislator as saying in an interview with Iran's Arabic-language news channel Al-Alam.

On December 4, the Iranian military's electronic warfare units brought down the US RQ-170 Sentinel stealth aircraft with minimal damage. The spy drone was flying over the eastern city of Kashmar, some 225km (140 miles) from the Afghan border.

The aircraft, designed and developed by the American company Lockheed Martin, had crossed into Iran's airspace over the border with neighboring Afghanistan.

Sorouri added that Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) has made great progress in countering electronic warfare and emphasized that except the US, no country has obtained such a capacity yet.

He stated that Iran succeeded in identifying and disrupting the US electronic management of the flying object and managed to down it with little damage.

The legislator noted that the decryption data on the downed US spy drone is close to the final stage, saying Iran will soon acquire confidential information which will be used as evidence in taking action against the United States.

On December 6, two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the drone had been part of a CIA reconnaissance mission, involving the United States intelligence community stationed in Afghanistan.

Head of the Iranian Judiciary High Council for Human Rights Mohammad Javad Larijani said on Sunday that the violation of Iran's airspace by the American spy drone is a blatant example of rights violation and legal action will be taken against the US.

He added that Tehran would be pursing this clear instance of the violation of its sovereignty.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/215189.html

Logged
0
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)
How Iran hijacked a US stealth drone

Posted on December 15, 2011 - 13:52 by Trent Nouveau

The Iranian military recently managed to hijack an American stealth drone by exploiting a well-known navigational vulnerability in the RQ-170 Sentinel, aka The Beast of Kandahar.

According to an Iranian engineer, electronic warfare specialists cut off US contact with the drone before reconfiguring the Sentinel's GPS coordinates and landing it in Iranian territory. 



How Iran hijacked a US stealth drone"The GPS navigation is the weakest point," the engineer told the Christian Science Monitor.


"By putting noise [jamming] on the communications, you force the bird into autopilot. This is where the bird loses its brain."



The "spoofing" technique, said the engineer, utilized precise latitudinal and longitudinal data, "forcing the drone to land on its own where we wanted it to, without having to crack the remote-control signals and communications," from the US control center.


Former US Navy electronic warfare specialist Robert Densmore told the CS Monitor the digital hijacking scenario detailed by the unnamed Iranian engineer was entirely plausible.

"Even modern combat-grade GPS [is still] very susceptible to manipulation," Densmore confirmed. 



He also noted it was "certainly possible" to recalibrate the GPS on a drone so that it flies on a different course than originally programmed.

"[Obviously], I wouldn't say it's easy, but the technology is there."

http://www.tgdaily.com/security-features/60239-how-iran-hijacked-a-us-stealth-drone

Logged
0
Posts: 3011
*
ir
Major (سرگرد)
More details of the GPS spoofing here:

http://www.iranmilitaryforum.net/index.php?topic=12768.msg100228#msg100228

Before going more into this, it would not be smart for the IRI to detail exactly how the bird was commandeered.  In that context, whatever we hear from Iranian or US 'sources' is almost assuredly a step away from the truth.  That said, it is clear the UAV was somehow commandeered.  Anyway....

I don't know if the person in the link is an engineer or not but they have outlined 3 scenarios where one is sending spoofed GPS signals to the UAV.  They go ahead and exemplify that the UAV is made to think it is higher than it is and it subsequently reduces its altitude until it finally 'lands'.  They also go ahead and imply if the bird doesn't know it's landed and if the engines are still firing a simple 'netting' mechanism can be deployed to stop it.  However, they don't describe how the engines are eventually extinguished after being 'netted'.  To add to this, I can imagine that the navigation signal can be similarly spoofed.  I can also imagine that the spoofed GPS signal isn't entirely 'smooth' thus the minor dent during landing on the front LEFT wing and perhaps the possible damage to the landing and surveillance gear under the craft which is covered.  All these items have also been described by an Iranian engineer 'source' in today's CSM front page exclusive (again be aware of all misinfo and counter-misinfo).  Regardless, this is, otherwise, an almost entirely undamaged bird and almost certainly commandeered

This is truly awesome stuff.   

Mamdali
(Note:  I hope I'm being redundant by saying that given the state of misinformation and factless and unsupported content that is rife on the 'internet' today, naturally, I cannot endorse, believe, support, or accept any of links posted by me or others.  I personally find them interesting, however, as they open new perspectives for me.  I leave it to the reader to glean what they can or want from them).
Last Edit: December 16, 2011, 06:33:10 AM by mamdali

Logged
0
Posts: 299
*
us
Private (سرباز عادى)
'Iran UAVs to outmaneuver US drones'

Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:45AM GMT

A member of Iran's Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy Parviz Sorouri
Iran plans to carry out reverse engineering on an American spy drone downed by the Iranian military and mass-produce aircraft that can outmaneuver US unmanned aerial vehicles, an Iranian lawmaker says.


Iran will carry out reverse engineering on the captured RQ-170 Sentinel stealth aircraft at the next step, member of the Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy Parviz Sorouri said on Sunday.

Iranian engineers will prove that they have the essential capabilities to mass-produce aircraft of higher quality than US drones in the near future, IRIB quoted the legislator as saying in an interview with Iran's Arabic-language news channel Al-Alam.

On December 4, the Iranian military's electronic warfare units brought down the US RQ-170 Sentinel stealth aircraft with minimal damage. The spy drone was flying over the eastern city of Kashmar, some 225km (140 miles) from the Afghan border.

The aircraft, designed and developed by the American company Lockheed Martin, had crossed into Iran's airspace over the border with neighboring Afghanistan.

Sorouri added that Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) has made great progress in countering electronic warfare and emphasized that except the US, no country has obtained such a capacity yet.

He stated that Iran succeeded in identifying and disrupting the US electronic management of the flying object and managed to down it with little damage.

The legislator noted that the decryption data on the downed US spy drone is close to the final stage, saying Iran will soon acquire confidential information which will be used as evidence in taking action against the United States.

On December 6, two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the drone had been part of a CIA reconnaissance mission, involving the United States intelligence community stationed in Afghanistan.

Head of the Iranian Judiciary High Council for Human Rights Mohammad Javad Larijani said on Sunday that the violation of Iran's airspace by the American spy drone is a blatant example of rights violation and legal action will be taken against the US.

He added that Tehran would be pursing this clear instance of the violation of its sovereignty.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/215189.html

That's propaganda right? Iran had the tomcat for over 30 years now, still can't make all the parts for it. Plus A reversed engineered RQ170 is uselss if you don't have the supporting infrastructure in place.

Logged
0
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)
Quote
That's propaganda right? Iran had the tomcat for over 30 years now, still can't make all the parts for it. Plus A reversed engineered RQ170 is uselss if you don't have the supporting infrastructure in place.

Iranians are full of surprises. No one expected Iran to successfully resist disintegration in Iran/Iraq war, no one expected Iran to maintain and upgrade Its F-14's long after US destroyed the only other copies, no one expected Iran to manufacture its naval warships and submarines, no one ...................................all under the heaviest sanctions a country has ever been subjected to!

Never under estimate Iranians!


Catsoo

Logged
0
Posts: 15708
*
General (ارتشبد)