Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: Iran and cyber war  (Read 17305 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #75 on: May 24, 2012, 07:59:59 PM »
+1
Iranian students claim to have stolen info on NASA researchers

24 May 2012
A group of Iranian students are saying that they stole personal information on researchers at the US space agency.

According to a Pastebin post, the Cyber Warriors Team claimed that it had hacked an SSL certificate on the NASA site and gained access to researchers’ personal data.

“We succeeded To write (programming) a https Protocol Scanner under DOS Service (Sent the sources used). One of the reasons The Problem, Problem was in installing the SSL Service. We were exploring and use Of You Holes in https Protocol”, the group wrote in broken English.

The group said that it was able to obtain user emails and accounts for thousands of NASA researchers. NASA declined to comment on the group's assertions.

Commenting on the group’s claim, Anne Saita wrote in a Threatpost blog that the Cyber Warriors Team is apparently an independent group of Iranian student hackers and programmers “who promised to post video of the NASA attack at a later date.”

Saita said the group claimed that it created an HTTPS protocol scanner to locate the vulnerability in the NASA web site, later identified as NASA's Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review and Evaluation System site.

http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/25965/iranian-students-claim-to-have-stolen-info-on-nasa-researchers

Offline kaman

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5340
  • 00
  • Respect: +5185
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #76 on: May 29, 2012, 07:27:12 AM »
0
I guess that this so called virus could be used to spy on people too. However they tend to forget that the more sophisticated a virus gets the more out of control it may become.



Security experts said on Monday a highly sophisticated computer virus is infecting computers in Iran and other Middle East countries and may have been deployed at least five years ago to engage in state-sponsored cyber espionage.

Evidence suggest that the virus, dubbed Flame, may have been built on behalf of the same nation or nations that commissioned the Stuxnet worm that attacked Iran’s nuclear program in 2010, according to Kaspersky Lab, the Russian cyber security software maker that took credit for discovering the infections.

Kaspersky researchers said they have yet to determine whether Flame had a specific mission like Stuxnet, and declined to say who they think built it.

Iran has accused the United States and Israel of deploying Stuxnet.

Cyber security experts said the discovery publicly demonstrates what experts privy to classified information have long known: that nations have been using pieces of malicious computer code as weapons to promote their security interests for several years.

“This is one of many, many campaigns that happen all the time and never make it into the public domain,” said Alexander Klimburg, a cyber security expert at the Austrian Institute for International Affairs.

A cyber security agency in Iran said on its English website that Flame bore a “close relation” to Stuxnet, the notorious computer worm that attacked that country’s nuclear program in 2010 and is the first publicly known example of a cyber weapon.

Iran’s National Computer Emergency Response Team also said Flame might be linked to recent cyber attacks that officials in Tehran have said were responsible for massive data losses on some Iranian computer systems.

Kaspersky Lab said it discovered Flame after a U.N. telecommunications agency asked it to analyze data on malicious software across the Middle East in search of the data-wiping virus reported by Iran.

Stuxnet connection

Experts at Kaspersky Lab and Hungary’s Laboratory of Cryptography and System Security who have spent weeks studying Flame said they have yet to find any evidence that it can attack infrastructure, delete data or inflict other physical damage.

Yet they said they are in the early stages of their investigations and that they may discover other purposes beyond data theft. It took researchers months to determine the key mysteries behind Stuxnet, including the purpose of modules used to attack a uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, Iran.

If Kaspersky’s findings are validated, Flame could go down in history as the third major cyber weapon uncovered after Stuxnet and its data-stealing cousin Duqu, named after the Star Wars villain.

The Moscow-based company is controlled by Russian malware researcher Eugene Kaspersky. It gained notoriety after solving several mysteries surrounding Stuxnet and Duqu.

Officials with Symantec Corp and Intel Corp McAfee security division, the top 2 makers of anti-virus software, said they were studying Flame.

“It seems to be more complex than Duqu but it’s too early to tell its place in history,” said Dave Marcus, director of advanced research and threat intelligence with McAfee.

Symantec Security Response manager Vikram Thakur said that his company’s experts believed there was a “high” probability that Flame was among the most complex pieces of malicious software ever discovered.

At least one rival of Kaspersky expressed skepticism.

Privately held Webroot said its automatic virus-scanning engines detected Flame in December 2007, but that it did not pay much attention because the code was not particularly menacing.

That is partly because it was easy to discover and remove, said Webroot Vice President Joe Jaroch. “There are many more dangerous threats out there today,” he said.

Mapping it out

Kaspersky’s research shows the largest number of infected machines are in Iran, followed by Israel and the Palestinian territories, then Sudan and Syria.

The virus contains about 20 times as much code as Stuxnet, which caused centrifuges to fail at the Iranian enrichment facility it attacked. It has about 100 times as much code as a typical virus designed to steal financial information, said Kaspersky Lab senior researcher Roel Schouwenberg.

Flame can gather data files, remotely change settings on computers, turn on PC microphones to record conversations, take screen shots and log instant messaging chats.

Kaspersky Lab said Flame and Stuxnet appear to infect machines by exploiting the same flaw in the Windows operating system and that both viruses employ a similar way of spreading.

That means the teams that built Stuxnet and Duqu might have had access to the same technology as the team that built Flame, Schouwenberg said.

He said that a nation state would have the capability to build such a sophisticated tool, but declined to comment on which countries might do so.

The question of who built flame is sure to become a hot topic in the security community as well as the diplomatic world.

There is some controversy over who was behind Stuxnet and Duqu. Some experts suspect the United States and Israel, a view that was laid out in a January 2011 New York Times report that said it came from a joint program begun around 2004 to undermine what they say are Iran’s efforts to build a bomb.

The U.S. Defense Department, CIA, State Department, National Security Agency, and U.S. Cyber Command declined to comment.

Hungarian researcher Boldizsar Bencsath, whose Laboratory of Cryptography and Systems Security first discovered Duqu, said his analysis shows that Flame may have been active for at least five years and perhaps eight years or more.

That implies it was active long before Stuxnet.

“It’s huge and overly complex, which makes me think it’s a first-generation data gathering tool,” said Neil Fisher, vice president for global security solutions at Unisys Corp. “We are going to find more of these things over time.”

Others said cyber weapons technology has inevitably advanced since Flame was built.

“The scary thing for me is: if this is what they were capable of five years ago, I can only think what they are developing now,” Mohan Koo, managing director of British-based Dtex Systems cyber security company.

Some experts speculated that the discovery of the virus may have dealt a psychological blow to its victims, on top of whatever damage Flame may have already inflicted to their computers.

“If a government initiated the attack it might not care that the attack was discovered,” said Klimburg of the Austrian Institute for International Affairs. “The psychological effect of the penetration could be nearly as profitable as the intelligence gathered.”

Offline kaman

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5340
  • 00
  • Respect: +5185
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #77 on: May 29, 2012, 07:28:31 AM »
0
Ya'alon hints at possible Israeli role in 'Flame' virus
By ****.*** STAFF
05/29/2012 09:04
"Israel is blessed to be a nation possessing superior technology. These achievements of ours open up all kinds of possibilities for us," vice premier says after new super computer virus found to be attacking Iran.
Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe 'Bogie' Ya'alon. Photo: Ariel Jerozolimski

In comments that could be construed as suggesting that Israel is behind the "Flame" virus, the latest piece of malicious software to attack Iranian computers, Vice Premier Moshe Ya'alon on Tuesday said that "whoever sees the Iranian threat as a serious threat would be likely to take different steps, including these, in order to hurt them."

Speaking in an interview with Army Radio, Ya'alon further hinted that Jerusalem was behind the cyber attack, saying "Israel is blessed to be a nation possessing superior technology. These achievements of ours open up all kinds of possibilities for us."
Related:

    Stuxnet may have destroyed 1,000 centrifuges at Natanz
    Suspected cyber attack hits Iran oil industry

The virus, dubbed “Flame,” effectively turns every computer it infects into the ultimate spy. It can turn on PC microphones to record conversations taking place near the computer, take screenshots, log instant messaging chats, gather data files and remotely change settings on computers.

Security experts from the Russian Kaspersky Lab, who announced Flame’s discovery on Monday, said it is found in its highest concentration in Iranian computers. It can also be found in other Middle Eastern locations, including Israel, the West Bank, Syria and Sudan.

The virus has been active for as long as five years, as part of a sophisticated cyber warfare campaign, the experts said.

It is the most complex piece of malicious software discovered to date, according to Kaspersky Lab’s senior security researcher Roel Schouwenberg, who said he did not know who built Flame.

If the Lab’s analysis is correct, Flame could be the third major cyber weapon directed against Iran, after the Stuxnet virus that attacked Iran’s nuclear program in 2010, and its data-stealing cousin Duqu.

The complexity of the latest 'Flame' virus bears the hallmarks of a program engineered by a state, a number of Israeli computer experts believe.

As details of Flame filtered through the media, network security experts in Israel, requesting anonymity, studied the initial reports, and indicated that they believed small groups of hackers could not be behind the virus.

"This is not a couple of hackers who sat in a basement," one expert said. "This is a large, organized system. It is possible that years were invested in creating it."

A second analyst said that viruses at this level of sophistication require major capabilities and knowledge of code development, noting that "these are available only to states. And that's without mentioning a motive for developing [such a program]."

Yaakov Lappin contributed to this report.
http://businesstech.co.za/news/software/13842/iran-systems-burned-by-flame-virus/

Offline kaman

  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5340
  • 00
  • Respect: +5185
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #78 on: May 29, 2012, 07:40:18 AM »
0
New cyber spy virus worms its way through Middle-East


A powerful data-snatching virus targeting computers in Iran, Israel and other Middle Eastern countries has been discovered by Russian experts. The worm has been used for years for what seems to be state-sponsored cyber espionage.

­Russian cyber-security company Kaspersky Lab says the malware, codenamed Flame, is the largest and one of the most complex cyber-attacks ever discovered. It reports that the most severely affected computers are in Iran – but Israel, Syria and other countries across the Middle East have also been infected.

Kaspersky's first recorded instance of Flame dates back to August 2010, although the firm admits the worm could have been stealing data for years before that. The virus may also have been built on behalf of the same nation or nations that commissioned the Stuxnet virus that affected the Iranian nuclear program in 2010.

The Moscow-based company said on Monday that its researchers had yet to determine whether Flame had a specific mission, like Stuxnet or Duqu – another massive cyber-attack that had sought to infiltrate networks and steal data.

Flame’s code appears to be twenty times the size of Stuxnet’s. The malware is able to gather data files, remotely change settings on computers, turn on PC microphones or webcams in order to record conversations and video, take screen shots – and eventually send the data back to the attackers.

"Once a system is infected, Flame begins a complex set of operations, including sniffing the network traffic, taking screenshots, recording audio conversations, intercepting the keyboard, and so on," Kaspersky's chief malware expert Vitaly Kamlyuk told BBC.

The complexity of the virus and the targets that have been hit led Kaspersky Lab to believe that this a government is behind the cyber attacks. At the same time, the experts are not sure of its exact origins and have yet to determine whether Flame had a specific mission, like Stuxnet, whose attack Iran blamed on the United States and Israel.
US: 'No comment’

­Many experts believe Iran’s suspicions toward the US and Israel are not without merit. In January 2011, The New York Times came out with a report stating that both attacks originated from a joint program in 2004 aimed at undermining Iran's alleged efforts to build a nuclear bomb. The article said the program was authorized by US President George W. Bush, and later accelerated by his successor, Barack Obama.

A spokesman for the US Department of Defense, David Oten, declined to comment on Flame on Monday, Reuters reports. The CIA, State Department, National Security Agency, and US Cyber Command declined to comment as well.

Kaspersky Lab said it discovered Flame after a UN telecommunications body asked it to analyze data on malicious software across the Middle East in search of the data-wiping virus reported by Iran.
http://www.rt.com/news/flame-iran-virus-kaspersky-442/

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #79 on: May 29, 2012, 02:15:24 PM »
0
Russian Firm: Iran Victim of Another Cyberattack


By AMY TEIBEL Associated Press
JERUSALEM May 29, 2012 (AP)

A Russian-based internet security firm says a powerful computer virus with unprecedented data-snatching capabilities has attacked machines in Iran and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Iran has not disclosed any damage done by the new spyware virus, dubbed "Flame." Its origin has not been identified, but Israel's vice premier fueled speculation that his country, known for its technological innovation and tireless campaign against Iran's suspect nuclear program, unleashed it.

Russian digital security provider Kaspersky Lab, which identified the virus, said in a release posted on its website late Monday that "the complexity and functionality of the newly discovered malicious program exceed those of all other cyber menaces known to date."

It said preliminary findings suggest the virus has been active since March 2010, but eluded detection because of its "extreme complexity" and the fact that only selected computers are being targeted. Flame's primary purpose, it said, "appears to be cyber espionage, by stealing information from infected machines" and sending it to servers across the world.

According to Kaspersky, the virus collected information not only in Iran, but also in Israel and the Palestinian territories, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Iran, however, was far and away the country most affected, it said.

A unit of the Iranian communications and information technology ministry said only that it has produced an antivirus capable of identifying and removing the new malware. The Flame virus is the fourth known cyber attack on Iranian computer systems.

Comments Tuesday by Israel's vice premier did little to deflect suspicion about possible Israeli involvement in the latest attack.

"Whoever sees the Iranian threat as a significant threat is likely to take various steps, including these, to hobble it," Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon told Army Radio. "Israel is blessed with high technology, and we boast tools that open all sorts of opportunities for us."

Israel, like the West, rejects Tehran's claims that its nuclear program is designed to produce energy, not bombs. It considers Iran to be the greatest threat to its survival and repeatedly, if obliquely, threatened to attack Iran's nuclear facilities if Tehran doesn't abandon its uranium enrichment project, a key element of bomb making.

Because Flame is so complex, was not designed to hack into bank accounts and doesn't have the hallmarks of amateur hackers, Kaspersky has concluded that the research that went into the code was government-sponsored.

The code offers no information that can tie Flame to any specific country, Kaspersky said in its release, but a company agent in Israel said "you could more or less put your finger on any Western nation."

There is no indication of what kind of material it stole, but "we know that the computers that were infected were computers with very sensitive information" because the virus can be modified to mine whatever information is sought, added Ilan Froimovici, technical director at Power Communications, Kaspersky's representative in Israel.

Evidence suggests the same programmers were behind both Flame and Stuxnet, a virus that disrupted controls of some nuclear centrifuges in Iran in 2010, Froimovici said. The centrifuges are devices used in enriching uranium.

The two codes "use the same vulnerabilities in the operating system and the computer infrastructure in order to infect the computer system. We do believe that the same programmers built the two codes," he said.

Udi Mokady, CEO of Cyber-Ark, an Israeli developer of information security, said he thought four countries, in no particular order, have the technological know-how to develop so sophisticated a cyber offensive: Israel, the U.S., China and Russia.

"It was 20 times more sophisticated than Stuxnet," with thousands of lines of code that took a large team, ample funding and months, if not years, to develop, he said.

"It's a live program that communicates back to its master. It asks, where should I go? What should I do now? It's really almost like a science fiction movie."

Iran claims Stuxnet and other computer viruses have done no serious harm to Iran's nuclear or industrial facilities, and sees them as part of a campaign by Israel, the U.S. and their allies, which includes the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, to undermine the Iranian nuclear program.

Kaspersky said the cyber espionage worm came to its attention after the United Nations' International Telecommunication Union asked it for help in finding a piece of malware that was deleting sensitive information across the Middle East. The company stumbled across Flame when searching for that other code, it said.

The discovery of the Flame virus comes just days after talks between Iran and six world powers in Baghdad failed to persuade Tehran to freeze enrichment. A new round of nuclear talks is expected to take place in Moscow next month.

Yaalon, the Israeli vice premier, told Army Radio on Tuesday that the talks in Iraq "yielded no significant achievement" except to let Iran buy time. He appeared to take a swipe at President Barack Obama by saying it might "even be in the interest of some players in the West to play for time."

Yaalon in the past expressed disappointment that the U.S. has delayed plans to expand sanctions against Iran, suggesting Washington was afraid the penalties would send oil prices soaring and hurt Obama's re-election chances.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/russian-firm-iran-victim-cyberattack-16449005#.T8TZldXp_Ek

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #80 on: May 29, 2012, 02:21:54 PM »
0
Iranian oil industry was target of world's nastiest cyber worm

Nick Hopkins
May 30, 2012

Ads by Google
Dispensary in Warren

reliefchoices.com

Patients that are seeking quality, organic buds and edibles
A view of a petrochemical complex in Assaluyeh on Iran's Persian Gulf coast May 28, 2006. Picture taken on May 28, 2006.

Targeted by "the most complex malware ever found" ... Iran's oil industry. Photo: Reuters

LONDON: A cyber attack that targeted Iran's oil ministry and main export terminal was caused by the most sophisticated computer worm yet developed, experts have said.

The virus appears to have been directed primarily at a small number of organisations and individuals in Iran, the West Bank, Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates. This will inevitably raise suspicions that Israel or the US were involved in some way.

Analysts decoding the worm, which is variously dubbed Flame, Skywiper and W32.Flamer, have been unable to identify the source. They say only a professional team working for several months could be behind it.
Advertisement: Story continues below

Hungary's CrySys Laboratory said: ''The results of our technical analysis support the hypothesis [the worm] was developed by a government agency of a nation state with significant budget and effort, and it may be related to cyber warfare activities. It is certainly the most sophisticated malware we [have] encountered. Arguably, it is the most complex malware ever found.''

Orla Cox, a senior analyst at Symantec, said: ''I would say that this is the most sophisticated threat we have ever seen.''

Symantec did analysis of the Stuxnet virus, which targeted Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities two years ago, sending some centrifuges out of control. Ms Cox said W32.Flamer appeared to be even more complex and was an incredibly clever, comprehensive ''spying program''.

''It is a backdoor worm that goes looking for very specific information. It scrapes a mass of information from any infected machines and then sends it, without the user having any idea what is going on. The amount of information it can send is huge.'' Some researchers say certain characteristics common to Stuxnet and Flame suggest whoever built Stuxnet is behind Flame.

''It's very likely it's two teams working effectively on the same program but using two very different approaches,'' said Roel Schouwenberg, a senior researcher with Kaspersky Labs.

Symantec started working on the code at the weekend after it was discovered by specialists at the Laboratory of Cryptography and System Security, at the University of Budapest.

Analysis now shows the worm has been around, undetected, for at least two years, and experts are confident it was responsible for the disruption to Iran's oil industry last month. The attack forced Iran to convene a ''crisis committee'' that disconnected six oil terminals from the internet, to stop the worm spreading.

Guardian News & Media, The Washington Post

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/iranian-oil-industry-was-target-of-worlds-nastiest-cyber-worm-20120529-1zhgc.html#ixzz1wGi7pvBG

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #81 on: May 29, 2012, 05:35:59 PM »
0
Iran Says It Can Destroy Sophisticated Data-Stealing Virus

Source: VOA

The Iranian government said Tuesday it has produced an antivirus program capable of fighting what computer experts are calling "the most sophisticated cyber weapon yet unleashed."

The data-stealing virus has been infecting computers in Iran and other parts of the Middle East.

Iran's Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Center said Tuesday the antivirus tool can identify and remove the sophisticated spyware, identified a day earlier by a Russian Internet security company. The Iranian ministry did not say if the virus had done any damage.

Russia's Kaspersky Lab dubbed the virus "Flame" and described it as a malicious program whose "complexity and functionality exceed those of all other cyber menaces known to date." It said virus has stolen information from computers in Iran, Israel and other parts of the region.

In a separate report, the Hungarian Laboratory of Cryptography and System Security named the virus "sKyWIper" and said Hungarian computers also have been infected.

The spyware works by copying files and activating computer microphones to record conversations before sending the data through a series of servers to the program source.

No one has claimed responsibility for the computer attacks.

But Israeli Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon said Tuesday cyber weapons such as Flame are a "reasonable" tool for any nation trying to "hobble" the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. He also said Israel is a "technologically rich" nation whose tools "open up all sorts of opportunities."

Tensions between Iran and Israel have increased steadily in recent months, as has speculation about a possible Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear sites. Iran says its controversial nuclear program is peaceful. But talks have been continuing with world powers to curb Iran's weapons capability.

Iran suffered a major cyberattack in 2010 when a virus known as Stuxnet knocked out computers at its nuclear facilities. Tehran has blamed the Stuxnet attack on Israel and the West, whom it accuses of trying to sabotage the Iranian nuclear program.

The head of science, technology and security at Tel Aviv University, Isaac Ben-Israel, told VOA the Flame virus uses a different software language from Stuxnet, making it unlikely the two are related. He also said Flame is the largest virus of its kind ever detected with a file size of 20 megabytes.

Ben-Israel said Flame is not the most dangerous virus because it steals information rather than causing damage in the physical world.

"If you speak about danger, the real danger in using cyber technology is damaging computers which control physical systems like trains and power production," he said.

Ben-Israel said the virus appears to be the work of a government with sufficient resources to invest in gathering intelligence from the Middle East. He said 60 to 70 countries have such capabilities, but doubted the Israeli government is responsible because Israel is among the nations whose computers have been infected.

http://www.****.***/news/12/may/1294.html

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #82 on: June 01, 2012, 01:07:24 PM »
0
Obama Administration takes cyberwarfare to new level, report says

The New York Times is reporting today, citing a host of sources, that the Obama Administration pressed forward with Stuxnet's attack on Iran, and has used cyberwarfare extensively.


by Don Reisinger
June 1, 2012 5:29 AM PDT

The Obama Administration has been fighting a clandestine cyberwar against foreign governments and Al Qaeda, and its efforts in that space have far exceeded those of its predecessors, according to a new report.

The New York Times today has unleashed a wide-ranging report on the Obama Administration's use of cyberwarfare to take on Iran and potentially other countries or entities it views as a threat. Chief among the administration's targets was Iran's nuclear plants, including the Natanz facility targeted by Stuxnet.

According to the Times, citing several unidentified security officials, the Obama Administration didn't initiate plans to attack Iran's nuclear facilities -- the Bush Administration did -- but it did accelerate the initiative, known as Olympic Games. And the result of those efforts was none other than Stuxnet.

Stuxnet was first discovered in 2010 after it was found to be attacking the Natanz nuclear plant in Iran. Soon after, security researchers found that it was a highly sophisticated attack designed to attack computers running Siemens software used in industrial control systems. Several countries, including European Union allies of the U.S., expressed extreme concern over the malware. The U.S., however, was relatively tight-lipped on the outbreak.

"The question is where the heck is the Department of Homeland Security?" Joe Weiss, a critical infrastructure security expert, said in an interview with CNET in 2010. "There is no real guidance being given. There is nothing going out to the utilities or other end users talking about the actual compromise of the controller itself."

According to the Times, the seeming disinterest on the part of the U.S. might have been due to the fact that it created the malware. But behind closed doors, according to the Times' sources, President Obama was wondering if the country should shut down Stuxnet after it had been discovered due to a "programming error." According to the Times' sources, he was told by his officials to press on, and just a few weeks after it was detected, a new version of the worm took down nearly 1,000 of Iran's centrifuges.

But the U.S. didn't act alone. According to the Times, a special Israel unit collaborated with the U.S. on its attacks on Iran. For the U.S., according to the Times' sources, working with Israel made sense. For one, Israel has intimate knowledge of Iran, a country it has long viewed as a major threat. The collaboration also helped the U.S. hold off any of Israel's plans to launch a preemptive strike against the nuclear facilities, according to the Times.

If the U.S. and Israel were actually behind Stuxnet and its attacks on Iran, it would confirm rampant speculation dating back to 2010. Soon after news of the attack went public, several security researchers and observers charged the U.S. and Israel with planting the malware -- which was initially delivered through a USB thumb drive -- and taking aim at Iran. Neither country admitted to that, and continue to stay tight-lipped on the matter.

A similar scenario has played out in the wake of the discovery of another worm, Flame. That payload, which was discovered earlier this week, has reportedly been in operation since 2010. Unlike Stuxnet, which was designed to take down physical sites, Flame steals information about targeted systems and stored files, as well as information on the computer display and audio conversations. Iran was the central target for the virus, but it also impacted machines in the West Bank, Syria, and other Middle East countries, as well as Sudan.

Kaspersky Lab, which was first to discover the virus, has said that it believes the malware is "state-sponsored," and fingers have once again been pointed at the U.S. and Israel. Just yesterday, an Israel spokesperson for the country's vice prime minister, Moshe Ya'alon, denied any involvement in the attack. That followed a claim made by an unidentified U.S. official, telling MSNBC that "it was U.S." behind the attack -- a charge the government has not confirmed.

More to come...


http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57445275-83/obama-administration-takes-cyberwarfare-to-new-level-report-says/

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #83 on: June 02, 2012, 05:12:34 PM »
0
Sophisticated cyber-battles raise fears of cyber-blowback

White House warns businesses about computer viruses amid suspicions of US involvement

By Richard Lardner


WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is warning American businesses about an unusually potent computer virus that infected Iran's oil industry even as suspicions persist that the United States is responsible for secretly creating and unleashing cyberweapons against foreign countries.

The government's dual roles of alerting U.S. companies about these threats and producing powerful software weapons and eavesdropping tools underscore the risks of an unintended, online boomerang.

Unlike a bullet or missile fired at an enemy, a cyberweapon that spreads across the Internet may circle back accidentally to infect computers it was never supposed to target. It's one of the unusual challenges facing the programmers who build such weapons, and presidents who must decide when to launch them.

The Homeland Security Department's warning about the new virus, known as "Flame," assured U.S. companies that no infections had been discovered so far inside the U.S. It described Flame as an espionage tool that was sophisticated in design, using encryption and other techniques to help break into computers and move through corporate or private networks. The virus can eavesdrop on data traffic, take screenshots and record audio and keystrokes. The department said the origin is a mystery.

The White House has declined to discuss the virus.

Suspicions heightened

But suspicions about the U.S. government's role in the use of cyberweapons were heightened by a report in Friday's New York Times . Based on anonymous sources, it said President Barack Obama secretly had ordered the use of another sophisticated cyberweapon, known as Stuxnet, to attack the computer systems that run Iran's main nuclear enrichment facilities. The order was an extension of a sabotage program that the Times said began during the Bush administration.

Private security researchers long have suspected that the U.S. and Israeli governments were responsible for Stuxnet. But the newspaper's detailed description of conversations in the Oval Office among Obama, the vice president and the CIA director about the U.S. government's responsibility for Stuxnet is the most direct evidence of this to date. U.S. officials rarely discuss the use of cyberweapons outside of classified settings.

Stuxnet is believed to have been released as early as 2009. It was discovered in June 2010 by a Belarusian antivirus researcher analyzing a customer's infected computer in Iran. It targeted electronic program controllers built by Siemens AG of Germany that were installed in Iran. The U.S. government also circulated warnings to American businesses about Stuxnet after it was detected.

The White House said Friday it would not discuss whether the U.S. was responsible for the Stuxnet attacks on Iran.

"I'm not able to comment on any of the specifics or details," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. "That information is classified for a reason, and it is kept secret. It is intended not to be publicized because publicizing it would pose a threat to our national security."

Uncharted territory

Cyberweapons are uncharted territory because the U.S. laws are ambiguous about their use, and questions about their effectiveness and reliability are mostly unresolved. Attackers online can disguise their origins or even impersonate an innocent bystander organization, making it difficult to identify actual targets when responding to attacks.

Viruses and malicious software, known as malware, rely on vulnerabilities in commercial software and hardware products. But it is hard to design a single payload that always will succeed because the target may have fixed a software vulnerability or placed computers behind a firewall.

On the Internet, where being connected is a virtue, an attack intended for one target can spread unexpectedly. Whether a cyberweapon can boomerang depends on its state of the art, according to computer security experts. On that point, there are deep divisions over Flame.

Russian digital security provider Kaspersky Lab, which first identified the virus, said Flame's complexity and functionality "exceed those of all other cybermenaces known to date." There is no doubt, the company said, that a government sponsored the research that developed it. Yet Flame's author remains unknown because there is no information in the code of the virus that would link it to a particular country.

Other experts said it wasn't as fearsome.

'No secret sauce'

Much of the code used to build the virus is old and available on the Internet, said Becky Bace, chief strategist at the Center for Forensics, Information Technology and Security at the University of South Alabama. Flame could have been developed by a small team of smart people who are motivated and have financial backing, she said, making it just as likely a criminal enterprise or a group working as surrogates could have been responsible.

"Here's the wake-up call as far as cyber is concerned: You don't have to be a nation-state to have what it would take to put together a threat of this particular level of sophistication," said Bace, who spent 12 years at the National Security Agency working on intrusion detection and network security. "There's no secret sauce here."

Stuxnet was far more complex.

Still, Stuxnet could not have worked without detailed intelligence about Iran's nuclear program that was obtained through conventional spycraft, said Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at F-Secure, a digital security company in Helsinki, Finland. The countries with the motivation and the means to gather that data are the United States and Israel, he said.

"This is at the level of complexity that very few organizations in the world would even attempt," said Hypponen, who has studied Stuxnet and Flame. "Basically you have to have moles. Most of what they needed to pull this off was most likely collected with what we would characterize as traditional intelligence work."

Collateral damage?

The more intricately designed a cyberweapon is, the less likely it will boomerang. Stuxnet spread well beyond the Iranian computer networks it was intended to hit. But the collateral damage was minimal because the virus was developed to go after very specific targets.

"When some of these super sophisticated things spread, it's bad but it may not have the same impact because the virus itself is so complex," said Jacob Olcott, a senior cybersecurity expert at Good Harbor Consulting. "It's designed to only have its impact when it finds certain conditions."

Israel is a world leader in cybertechnology and senior Israeli officials did little to deflect suspicion about that country's involvement in cyberweapons. "Whoever sees the Iranian threat as a significant threat is likely to take various steps, including these, to hobble it," said Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon, a former military chief and minister of strategic affairs.

A senior defense official involved in Israel's cyberwarfare program said Friday that, "Israel is investing heavily in units that deal with cyberwarfare both for defense and offense." He would not elaborate. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not allowed to speak with the media.

Isaac Ben-Israel, an adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on cybersecurity issues, declined Friday to say whether Israel was involved with Stuxnet.

It could take years to know who is responsible, which is what is so unsettling about attacks in cyberspace. "We are very good as an industry at figuring out what a piece of malware does," said Dave Marcus, director of advanced research and threat intelligence at digital security giant McAfee. "But we are less accurate when it comes to saying what group is responsible for it, or it came from this country or that organization."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47658329/ns/technology_and_science-security/#.T8pIt1KrGoY

Online Maverickk004

  • سرباز عادى
  • *
  • Posts: 120
  • au
  • ...::: From the Light comes the Dark :::...
  • Respect: +49
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #84 on: June 03, 2012, 05:25:12 AM »
0
Cyberattack clouds US-Iran nuclear talks

Fresh revelations about US involvement in the “Stuxnet” computer virus which damaged an Iranian nuclear facility are likely to complicate the already tense negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme.
According to a report in the New York Times based on a forthcoming book, President Barack Obama personally ordered the cyberattack on the Iranian nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz in a joint operation with Israel.

Although it has long been widely believed that the US and Israel were behind the 2010 Stuxnet virus, the new details about the Obama administration’s role are likely to add to Iranian mistrust of the US ahead of the next round of negotiations with leading nations over its nuclear programme in three weeks’ time in Moscow.
“The major barrier to any breakthrough in the talks has been the profound lack of trust between the US and Iran,” said Cliff Kupchan, an analyst at Eurasia Group in Washington. “This description is not a game-changer, but it adds to the existing serious obstacles.”
According to Friday’s article, Mr Obama stepped up a project called “Olympic Games” which was started in 2006 under the Bush administration. A spring 2010 virus targeted the Natanz facility and appeared to damage one-fifth of the centrifuges operating there, but after a few months it leaked out into the internet where it became known as Stuxnet.
The report underlines the complicated politics and ethics for the Obama administration of launching such an attack at a time when the US is increasingly worrying about the abilities of other countries to use the techniques of cyberwar against it.
“This is the first attack of a major nature in which a cyberattack was used to effect physical destruction,” Michael Hayden, the former Central Intelligence Agency head, is quoted as saying. “Somebody crossed the Rubicon.”
The revelations come in the same week that security experts have discovered a new virus which has infected computers in Iran and other parts of the Middle East. Known as “Flame”, it is designed to collect information rather than destroy equipment.
Tehran did not react to the New York Times story on Friday. However, the report of US and Israeli involvement in the cyberattack could give more credibility to Iranian claims that the two countries were also behind the assassination of at least four nuclear scientists.
It could also strengthen the Islamic government’s suspicions that the US and Israel are in much closer agreement than is often thought about the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iran. “It is a lie that the US is against an attack on Iran and Israel may do it on its own,” said one former Iranian official this week. “If Israel attacks the nuclear sites, Iran’s retaliation would be first against the US because Israel is in no place to act without the US permission.”
While former president Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani said last week for the second time in recent months that Tehran could not be hostile to the US for ever, Iranian analysts believe Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, still believes Washington is using the nuclear issue to push the broader goal of regime change. He has urged politicians not to be fooled by “smiles” – a clear reference to Mr Obama.
However, Iranian anger over the attack has been tempered by the fact that Stuxnet largely failed in its efforts and the Iranian nuclear programme has quickly made up lost ground.
Although the new revelations come at a delicate time for the nuclear talks with Iran, which the Obama administration is keen to continue and would not want to see collapse in the middle of an election campaign, they could offer some domestic political upside. The fact that Mr Obama stepped up the Bush-era cyberwar programme will help counter Republican attacks that his administration has been too soft on Iran.
However, they complicate US efforts to criticise the cyber activities of other governments. In an unusually blunt report issued last year by US intelligence agencies, the Obama administration said that massive cyberespionage operations by China and Russia posed a “significant and growing threat” to US national security, yet other countries often view US complaints as hypocritical given its own cyber activities.



http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/08b8b06e-ac04-11e1-923a-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1whfUW19w
You can't let other people tell you who you are...it's something you have to decide for yourself.

Online M-ATF

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2766
  • ir
  • Respect: +2712
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #85 on: June 04, 2012, 06:08:06 AM »
0
30 countries have asked Iran help them to confront "Flame" malware

Deputy of Information Technology of Iran Organization says "MAHER" center of this orgnization could detect this malware one month ago and this center was working on creating anti-malware and cleaning tools for this malware since that time.

This malware wasnt detected by more than 34 anti-virus of the world, after preparation of cleaning tools of this malware by "MAHER" center, more than 30 countries such as Australia, Netherland, Malaysia and even countries that we have no relation with them contacted with "MAHER" center and requested help for confrontation and cleaning this malware.

Quote
نسخه چاپيارسال به دوستان
معاون سازمان فناوری اطلاعات در گفت‌وگو با فارس خبر داد
درخواست کمک 30 کشور دنیا از "ماهر" ایران برای مقابله با بدافزار "شعله"

خبرگزاری فارس: معاون سازمان فناوری اطلاعات گفت: 30 کشور از جمله استرالیا، هلند و مالزی و حتی کشورهایی که تاکنون با آنها ارتباط نداشتیم با مرکز "ماهر" ارتباط برقرار کرده و تقاضای کمک و ارائه ابزار پاکسازی بدافزار "شعله" را داشتند.
خبرگزاری فارس: درخواست کمک 30 کشور دنیا از "ماهر" ایران برای مقابله با بدافزار "شعله"

اسماعیل رادکانی در گفت‌وگو با خبرنگار فناوری اطلاعات خبرگزاری فارس اظهار داشت: مرکز "ماهر" سازمان فناوری اطلاعات ایران، بالغ بر یک ماه پیش موفق به شناسایی بد افزار شعله شده بود و در این مدت مشغول تهیه ضد بدافزار و ابزار پاک‌سازی مربوطه  بوده است.

معاون سازمان فناوری اطلاعات ایران تاکید کرد: با توجه به اینکه این بد افزار توسط 34 آنتی ویروس دنیا قابل شناسایی نبود، پس از تهیه ابزار پاک سازی در مرکز ماهر، بالغ بر 30 کشور از جمله استرالیا، هلند و مالزی و حتی کشورهایی که تاکنون با آنها ارتباط نداشتیم، با مرکز ماهر ارتباط برقرار کردند و تقاضای کمک و ارائه ابزار پاکسازی و بدافزار داشتند.

رئیس مرکز ماهر سازمان فناوری اطلاعات ایران تصریح کرد: شناسایی این بد افزار و تهیه ابزار پاک سازی آن، پیچیدگی های خاصی داشت و نسبت به بد افزارهای گذشته، پیچیده تر بود.


http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13910314000368

Offline rouz

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2236
  • zw
  • Respect: +2191
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #86 on: June 04, 2012, 07:13:27 AM »
0
And here you can find their Flame removal tool:

http://www.certcc.ir/index.php?name=news&file=article&sid=1901

« Last Edit: June 04, 2012, 07:16:27 AM by rouz »

Offline the8march

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2279
  • lb
  • كونا للظالم خصماً وللمظلوم عوناً
  • Respect: +2417
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #87 on: June 04, 2012, 09:11:45 AM »
0
And here you can find their Flame removal tool:

http://www.certcc.ir/index.php?name=news&file=article&sid=1901


Just tried it, my system is clean :D

In the past few months i have seen several documentaries on Stuxnet .. and last week there were several articles about Obama personally overlooking the cyber war ect... as a conclusion, you get out with the impression that US has devastated Iran's nuclear program.. and that the whole Uranium enrichment program was destroyed ... pure lies


Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #88 on: June 04, 2012, 02:45:01 PM »
0
Why are Israel and America suddenly speaking so openly about cyber warfare?

Warning: Source is Zionist

Quote
First, were these revelations part of a coordinated decision between Washington and Jerusalem to momentarily lift the cloak of darkness over their joint cyber efforts? Or are organizations and individuals in either country just trying to grab some of the credit for their own purposes?

Second, if the openness is intentional, who is all this information aimed at? Is their purpose to create more pressure on Iran, where researchers, officers and ordinary citizens are afraid to use their computers and the leaders have to take into account that further attempts to hide nuclear development are bound to fail? Or is this the Obama Administration trying to convince public opinion in the U.S and Israel and of course the Netanyahu government that the intelligence and electronic war on Iran is sufficient, and that there is no need for military strikes? And are certain elements in Israel's security and political establishment helping the Americans do this?

Third, is this just an aberration or are we going to see in the near future an acceptance by governments that cyber warfare is an accepted extension of diplomacy by other means? And how will Iran and other countries targeted in this way respond?


http://www.****.***/blogs/the-axis/why-are-israel-and-america-suddenly-speaking-so-openly-about-cyber-warfare-1.434352


Catsoo

Online IronHorse110

  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 6886
  • ir
  • Vahdat, Moghavemat, Ezzat
  • Respect: +2437
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #89 on: June 04, 2012, 03:54:17 PM »
0
as a conclusion, you get out with the impression that US has devastated Iran's nuclear program.. and that the whole Uranium enrichment program was destroyed ... pure lies

I find this to be their plan not to confront Iran, as it doesn't create an 'urgency' to confront Iran because the 'viruses' are doing it. The west's biggest goal is to get rid of Assad, before they confront Iran. If they can't remove Assad and Syria stabilizes and becomes more powerful, there is no way in hell they could confront Iran.

This is why you keep hearing about this 'cyber' war. The real cyber war is being fought without anyone having a clue of what is going on, where its coming from and how its happening.

I can bet my top dollar that Iran has agents within every big US company gathering cyber intel, this happened right at the onset of Iran-Iraq war with the huge emigration of Iranians to the west. Also, it doesn't necessarily have to be 'Iranian' nationals, there are many disgruntled Pakistanis, Indians who are in good positions in many companies, agencies...
Ya Ali, molla Ali (as)

"There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance" - Imam Ali (as)

"''melate ma neshan dade'ast ke be hadaf haye khod momen, va dar rahe on, ta nesar'e jaan eestade'ast.. chenin melati, az america va az hiiich ghodrati nemitars'ad, va be yaari'e khoda neshan khahad daad ke pirooz az on' e hagh, va momenan be hagh ast!"

- Rahbar'e moazzam'e Enghlab'e Islami Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei

Online mamdali

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2252
  • ir
  • Respect: +831
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #90 on: June 04, 2012, 04:20:50 PM »
0
The same question has come to my mind as well (why the sudden revelations about the cyber operations?).  The Haaretz blog mentions a few reasons for these 'revelations' except for the most obvious ones of all: either there's been a leak or the target of the operation has complete control of the situation.  Either way, keeping the secret is useless even damaging especially when there can be significant public relations value derived by publishing myths and stories loosely related to the 'secret operations' as we see in this case. 

There is no doubt Stuxnet created limited damage on Iranian centrifuges but there is also no doubt the Iranians absorbed it, contained it, and very quickly recovered from it.

Mamdali
« Last Edit: June 04, 2012, 04:29:51 PM by mamdali »
(Note:  I hope I'm being redundant by saying that given the state of misinformation and factless and unsupported content that is rife on the 'internet' today, naturally, I cannot endorse, believe, support, or accept any of links posted by me or others.  I personally find them interesting, however, as they open new perspectives for me.  I leave it to the reader to glean what they can or want from them).

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8457
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2331
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #91 on: June 04, 2012, 06:45:12 PM »
+1
Here you go, this is why I keep getting pissed off by Iran for using Microsoft Windows.

The Flame Trojan that targetted Iranian machines was digitally signed by a Microsoft certificate. If you don't know what this means: the Trojan had a digital signature, making your WINDOWS computer think that it is trusted software that is sent from Microsoft (like an update). Now of course, two years later after Iran discovered the Trojan (for two years, God knows how much damage this thing has done)... now all of a sudden Microsoft releases a fix (a windows update) that invalidates that particular signature signature.

http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/06/04/1211206/microsoft-certificate-was-used-to-sign-flame-malware

People, stop using windows for your own good! (Let me add that Microsoft is one of the official partners of the NSA)
« Last Edit: June 04, 2012, 06:52:42 PM by Pasdar »

Offline rouz

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2236
  • zw
  • Respect: +2191
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #92 on: June 04, 2012, 07:10:15 PM »
0
Here you go, this is why I keep getting pissed off by Iran for using Microsoft Windows.

The Flame Trojan that targetted Iranian machines was digitally signed by a Microsoft certificate. If you don't know what this means: the Trojan had a digital signature, making your WINDOWS computer think that it is trusted software that is sent from Microsoft (like an update). Now of course, two years later after Iran discovered the Trojan (for two years, God knows how much damage this thing has done)... now all of a sudden Microsoft releases a fix (a windows update) that invalidates that particular signature signature.

http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/06/04/1211206/microsoft-certificate-was-used-to-sign-flame-malware

People, stop using windows for your own good! (Let me add that Microsoft is one of the official partners of the NSA)


What would stop them from creating viruses for other operating systems then?

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8457
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2331
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #93 on: June 04, 2012, 07:19:22 PM »
+1
It wouldn't and they do already. What you and I and especially Iran need, is an operating system you have more control over and know wtf is happening on it and could potentially happen. Also, you can't bypass linux/BSD security with things like certificates. (Stuxnet and Duqu were also digitally signed). The way unix/unix like systems are designed makes it more difficult for such a thing to happen. In most cases you'd actually have to permit the virus to run on your system to begin with.

Iran can run its own linux distribution, add its own repositories (for software updates) and actually work on the operating system itself... control 100% what comes in and goes out.

Windows on the other hand is a binary distribution (basically an executable... you have no idea what the source is doing or is built to do). Microsoft has a whole lot of control over your system.

Offline the8march

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2279
  • lb
  • كونا للظالم خصماً وللمظلوم عوناً
  • Respect: +2417
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #94 on: June 05, 2012, 03:03:13 PM »
0
Bad Microsoft...


Online mamdali

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2252
  • ir
  • Respect: +831
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #95 on: June 05, 2012, 03:39:08 PM »
0

U.S. cyberattacks increase likelihood of Iran developing nukes, experts warn
Tue Jun 5, 2012 10:05 AM EDT


by Jordan Michael Smith
 During his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities, dramatically escalating a program begun under President Bush, The New York Times reported last week. Administration officials say the stepped up program, code-named “Olympic Games,” has delayed Iran’s efforts to build nuclear weapons, buying the U.S. valuable time.

But not everyone agrees. Indeed, several experts argue that in fact, the attacks have helped alienate Iran, thereby increasing—not decreasing—the chances that it will ultimately develop nukes.

“Despite the fact that Iran’s timetable to enrich uranium may have been set back, the country has increasingly enriched uranium even as the cyber-attacks have gone on,” Reza Marashi, who served in the Office of Iranian Affairs at the U.S. State Department during both the Bush and Obama administrations, told MSNBC’s Lean Forward. The attacks, according to Marashi, have hardened Iran’s resolve to build a full-blown nuclear program, by convincing the regime that it needs to protect itself from the United States and Israel.

“We’ve really opened up Pandora’s Box with the cyberattacks, which are really unprecedented,” added Marashi, who is now research director at the National Iranian American Council.

Paul Pillar, a former CIA veteran of nearly 30 years who specialized in the Middle East, goes further, labeling the sabotage a clear-cut act of aggression.

“With the cyberattacks, we have passed a threshold by pursuing a direct form of warfare,” Pillar, currently a visiting professor at Georgetown University, said, adding that it’s no coincidence that the agencies in charge of the program—the National Security Agency and the Department of Defense—control war-making for the United States.

In the short-term, U.S. sabotage of Iranian computer programs—which uses a worm known as Stuxnet, developed jointly with Israel—may delay the mullahs’ pursuit of nuclear weapons, but in the long-term it has the exact opposite effect, says Pillar.

One reason why: The attacks undermine the ongoing diplomatic negotiations.

“The only scenario in which the Iranians would decide not to have a nuclear programs is when they are convinced that we want a lasting deal with them, and when we are not seen as being hostile to them,” says Pillar. “The cyber-attacks are certainly an indication of hostility on the part of Israel and the United States which add to the Iranian perception that they need to deter any attack on them.”

Marashi agreed, saying that the Stuxnet attacks have launched an arms race with the Iranians, likely leading them to respond in some fashion. “This creates a sort of cat-and-mouse game with each side creating new facts on the ground that leads us into uncharted waters,” he said.

Of course, the larger context here is an ongoing debate about how our Iran policy should balance carrots and sticks. Many hawks—including Mitt Romney—say only intense pressure will convince Iran to abandon its weapons program. "Only when [Iran's leaders] understand that at the end of that road lies not nuclear weapons but ruin will there be a real chance for a peaceful resolution," Romney wrote in a recent Washington Post op-ed.

 After all, the hard-liners argue, didn’t Obama extend a hand to the Iranians only in 2009, only to have it slapped back?

But proponents of engagement say that early outreach was halfhearted and wasn't pursued long or consistently enough to be effective—an argument bolstered by last week’s revelation that Obama ordered stepped-up cyber-attacks soon after taking office.

U.S. efforts to hack our way into Iran’s nuclear program may have set back that country’s quest to build nuclear weapons by weeks or months. But the value of that delay may be outweighed by the attacks’ other consequence: the deepening of Iran’s resolve to join the club of countries with the world’s worst weapons.

 

Jordan Michael Smith is a Contributing Writer at Salon

http://leanforward.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12052859-us-cyberattacks-increase-likelihood-of-iran-developing-nukes-experts-warn?lite

Offline Pasdar

  • Administrator
  • سرهنگ
  • *
  • Posts: 8457
  • ir
  • Defender of Justice
  • Respect: +2331
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #96 on: June 05, 2012, 05:10:01 PM »
+1
the8march, I hope you're not serious with the Apple logo.

Offline the8march

  • ستوان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 2279
  • lb
  • كونا للظالم خصماً وللمظلوم عوناً
  • Respect: +2417
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #97 on: June 05, 2012, 09:55:38 PM »
0
the8march, I hope you're not serious with the Apple logo.

not serious :D .. but what i wanted to say that we are dependent on the west and the various options they give us... and all are bad for us ... I dont know how an alternative operating system can work for us especially that we are also dependent on other software that have to run on Windows for example... Even if we develop our own operating system, they would also make viruses for them...

So i think the best would be to separate the sensitive computers from any networks and restrict access to them

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #98 on: June 07, 2012, 02:19:34 PM »
0
FBI probes leaks on Iran cyberattack

Wed Jun 6, 2012 1:57PM GMT
Share

 The FBI has opened an investigation into who disclosed information about a classified U.S. cyber-attack program aimed at Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the probe.

 The investigation follows publication last week of details of the cyber-sabotage program, including the use of a computer worm called Stuxnet, which Iran has acknowledged it found in its computers.

 The Central Intelligence Agency ran the operation in conjunction with Idaho National Laboratory, Israel and other U.S. agencies, according to people familiar with the efforts.

 The covert effort also includes drone surveillance and cyber-spying on Iranian scientists, the people said.

 The New York Times on Friday published an account of the U.S. cyber-attack operation in an excerpt from a forthcoming book by one of its reporters David Sanger that he said he has been working on for a year. Other news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal, followed up with details about the program. WSJ

 FACTS & FIGURES

 On Friday, the New York Times reported that U.S. President Barack Obama ordered stepped-up cyber-attacks on Iran's nuclear program months after taking office, significantly expanding America's first sustained use of cyber-weapons. Xinhua

 The operation, begun in 2006 under president George W. Bush and codenamed "Olympic Games," is the first known sustained U.S. cyber-attack ever launched on another country. NY Times

 The program, developed jointly with Israel, targeted the computer systems that run Iran's main nuclear enrichment facilities, the paper said. NY Times

 The United States, Israel, and some of their allies accuse Tehran of pursuing military objectives in its nuclear energy program. Washington and Tel Aviv have time and again threatened Tehran with the "option" of a military strike against its civilian nuclear facilities.

Iran rejects the allegations of pursuing military objectives in its nuclear energy program, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the IAEA, it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

http://www.presstv.com/usdetail/244884.html

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرتیپ
  • *
  • Posts: 10270
  • Respect: +4588
Re: Iran and cyber war
« Reply #99 on: June 07, 2012, 02:30:23 PM »
0
New York Times Leak Controversy Escalates

The Huffington Post  |  By Jack Mirkinson Posted: 06/07/2012 9:19 am Updated: 06/07/2012 10:06 am

Lindsey Graham

Members of Congress continued to condemn recent national security leaks to the media on Wednesday.

Sen. John McCain set off a frenzy on Tuesday when he accused the White House of selectively leaking high-level, classified information about President Obama's so-called "kill list," and about Obama's role in cyberattacks against Iran, to the New York Times. McCain suggested that the White House had leaked the stories to bolster Obama's re-election chances.

The White House hit back at McCain on Wednesday, saying that his claims, and his calls for an investigation, were "grossly irresponsible."

All through Wednesday, though, other legislators spoke out against the leaks. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close McCain ally, appeared on Greta van Susteren's Fox News show Wednesday night and echoed his friend's charges.

"I don't think you have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out what is going on here," he said. "I don't think it's an accident that you have three stories within about 45 days that paint the Obama administration as being effective in the war on terror at our national security detriment."

Peter King, the Republican chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security, made similar claims on CNN's "Outfront."

"This stuff is pouring out," he said. "There's always some leaks either accidentally or intentionally and usually one item or two items. But this is coming -- I mean, these are verbatim quotes from the Oval Office!"

Both stories contained direct quotes from either Obama or Vice President Joe Biden. The "kill list" story was compiled from interviews with three dozen current or former government officials.

Democrats, while condemning the stories, pushed back against the notion that they had been deliberately leaked by the Obama administration.

Appearing on "The Situation Room," Sen. Dianne Feinstein said that the "avalanche" of leaks had to stop. She also accused New York Times reporter David Sanger, who wrote the Iran story, of misleading her when he spoke to her about it.

"He assured me that what he was publishing, he had worked out with various agencies and he didn't believe that anything was revealed that wasn't known already," she said.

But Feinstein said she doubted that the information "came directly out of the top ranks of the White House."

Dean Baquet, managing editor of the Times, told Politico that no one in the government had ever warned the paper against publishing the story.

Sen. Bob Casey, a Democrat, also weighed in on the controversy. Speaking to Soledad O'Brien on Thursday, he called McCain's charges " very serious," and said that the Senate should have a closed hearing about them. "It shouldn't be a part of the usual political football in Washington," he continued. "It should be examined in a way that's substantive, that's thorough and that's balanced so that we arrive at the truth."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/07/new-york-times-white-house-leak-controversy_n_1577430.html

 

SMF 2.0.4 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Page created in 2.463 seconds with 27 queries.