0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Posts: 279
*
ir
Private (سرباز عادى)
The debate between arrow vs shahab, sejil ect is a lenghthy one, but i think what would give us a good idea of who has more advantage in the missile department would be if we know how many arrow missiles israel have. We dont know exaclty how many missiles Iran has but we can estimate with all the missiles that have 1000km+ range, iran has a lower end of approx 400 (reports say that iran has capacity of building 75 missiles w/2000km range a year [http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3636744,00.html], shahab was introduced 2003, the rest was estm maths).

1)So if iran was to launch 150 in a full scale war, would israel have enough no. of arrows to stop the majority of these missiles (assuming it has v.high hit ratio), also we know arrow systems have six launchers?

2) and how many missiles need to hit israel for it to stop US and Israel to stop war and retreat? i.e. how many sites does iran need to hit for Israels economy to diminish to a point where continuing war would be impossibl?
Last Edit: July 17, 2012, 12:46:28 PM by V.eightsixty

Logged
0
Posts: 166
*
de
Private (سرباز عادى)
The question is how many missiles and launchers Iran has and how many of them have to be destroyed until it stops war and shooting at US and Zionist targets.

Logged
0
Posts: 1348
Brother Skylark
*
fi
Master Sergeant (گروهبان)
Posts: 279
*
ir
Private (سرباز عادى)
Posts: 1348
Brother Skylark
*
fi
Master Sergeant (گروهبان)
Hitting just "Israel" would typically mean "hitting dirt", hence no need for interception unless the warhead is maneuvering one.

What comes to the later remark: whatever:D

Logged
0
Posts: 279
*
ir
Private (سرباز عادى)
Hitting just "Israel" would typically mean "hitting dirt", hence no need for interception unless the warhead is maneuvering one.

What comes to the later remark: whatever:D

I dont think Israel would know from miles off where the missiles would land, if they see a big missile like a shahab on their radar, they will intercept, i dont think they have the technology that tells them "hold on no need to intercept, that ones going no where". I dont know, do they?

Logged
0
Posts: 1348
Brother Skylark
*
fi
Master Sergeant (گروهبان)
That tech was already in limited use in 1991 when Iraqi scuds were being intercepted by Patriots with varying levels of success. You know, those missiles... are ballistic missiles. The last advancements in this field are already at tactical level (Iron Dome and other similar systems).

I dont think Israel would know from miles off where the missiles would land, if they see a big missile like a shahab on their radar, they will intercept, i dont think they have the technology that tells them "hold on no need to intercept, that ones going no where". I dont know, do they?

Logged
0
Posts: 279
*
ir
Private (سرباز عادى)
That tech was already in limited use in 1991 when Iraqi scuds were being intercepted by Patriots with varying levels of success. You know, those missiles... are ballistic missiles. The last advancements in this field are already at tactical level (Iron Dome and other similar systems).

If Israel has the technology mentioned above, the war if it does happen would be very much based on luck (how many missiles actually travel to the target) and how accurate the newer missiles of Iran are, and how many of those they have as suppose to the number of all the missiles in the iranian inventory.

Logged
0
Posts: 1348
Brother Skylark
*
fi
Master Sergeant (گروهبان)
Like I said; accuracy of Iranian missiles is critical factor. If they can reliably strike pin point targets, hundred missiles can overcome Israeli defences.. if their missiles are still city busters, they need to launch that hundred at once. And they would still need luck to cause anything more than civilian casualties.

Logged
0
Posts: 279
*
ir
Private (سرباز عادى)