Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?  (Read 1344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline maydayfire

  • گروهبان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1133
  • ir
  • Respect: +383
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2012, 10:13:24 PM »
0
http://gallery.military.ir/albums/userpics/r4.JPG

http://gallery.military.ir/albums/userpics/r7.JPG

the missile name is Sagheb, 4 years ago the yanks said iran did not have such capabilities and the footage shown back then was claimed by the yanks to have come from a chinese wargame. Again they will be proven wrong.
it's time to nut up or shut up!

Offline Nonbarbari

  • استوار دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1511
  • np
  • Respect: +181
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2012, 10:37:25 PM »
0
What!! Is this real??

Why is that we have never hurt of it or have any thread dedicated to it?? Or is it a completely a new missile???
You are once again threatened my beloved homeland,
I shall defend you until the last breath,
We embrace death if that's what it takes to save you, we have lived by Bushido code all along.

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5566
  • Respect: +317
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 02:50:26 AM »
0
The photos are still not clear. They could still be missiles fired by a fast attack boat.


Catsoo

Offline maydayfire

  • گروهبان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1133
  • ir
  • Respect: +383
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2012, 06:56:26 AM »
0
The photos are still not clear. They could still be missiles fired by a fast attack boat.


Catsoo
the launch angle is too steep for a missile fired from a fast attack boat.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2012, 07:26:18 AM by maydayfire »

Offline Nonbarbari

  • استوار دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1511
  • np
  • Respect: +181
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2012, 08:20:03 AM »
0
Small | Large
!


Offline Emirzaad

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 394
  • ir
  • Respect: +132
Re: Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2012, 08:29:52 PM »
0
is it ASM  or  Land attack Ballistic missile ??

Offline Catsoo

  • Global Moderator
  • سرهنگ دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 5566
  • Respect: +317
Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2012, 09:23:18 PM »
0
As seen here, the launch angle is too steep and the submarine underwater trail is perpendicular to the launch path.

I don't know what to make of this! Sub launched missiles are all vertical for what I know. The launch angle may signify that the missile canister is outside of the submarine and is an add-on package. But why would it launch 90 degree to the submarine ? I have no answers for that!


Catsoo

Offline Sobaka

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • ru
  • Respect: +30
Payambar-e Azam 3 Missile... more info please?
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2012, 07:54:25 AM »
+1
As seen here, the launch angle is too steep and the submarine underwater trail is perpendicular to the launch path.

I don't know what to make of this! Sub launched missiles are all vertical for what I know. The launch angle may signify that the missile canister is outside of the submarine and is an add-on package. But why would it launch 90 degree to the submarine ? I have no answers for that!


Catsoo

Catsoo,
I share your questions.  Subs can launch from vertical missile tubes or nearly horizontal torpedo tubes, the resulting launch angles.  Why then the low angle of launch seen in the video?  Hard to explain.

BTW,  when missiles are fired from subs, the angle is slightly less than 90 degrees.  Normally the sub tilts slightly about its longitudinal axis to prevent the missile from falling back onto the sub if the launch fails.  A few degrees of tilt is all that is needed.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.

 

SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Page created in 2.724 seconds with 23 queries.