Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: Why,instead of space rockets,Iran isnot trying to make an anti-satellite missile  (Read 845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stefano84

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
I' thing that is better to develop an anti-satellite missile than send a monkey into space

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite

Online aryana

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2893
  • ir
  • moores law driving force of innovation
  • Respect: +39
because it is much harder. anti sat is a missile with 3000 km  range using solid fuel .
Iran Khodro largest auto maker in larger middle east

Offline Jonk89

  • سرباز یكم
  • *
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +152
It is easier to destroy the function of a given satellite electronically than using missile. When a satellite is  unable to function properly it will be nothing but a space junk.

Offline farbod

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 702
  • en
  • Respect: +116
Iran said today they developed satelite jamming device.

Offline stefano84

  • اش خور
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
ok, but for the USA a destroyed satellite is a big money loss..

Offline omedAFG

  • سرباز عادى
  • *
  • Posts: 108
  • au
  • Respect: +7
its easier sending a satelitte into orbit than it is to take one out. it may be some time till iran has the capability to do that
Afghanistan- where empires go to die. -Mike Malloy

Offline maydayfire

  • گروهبان دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1133
  • ir
  • Respect: +383
I' thing that is better to develop an anti-satellite missile than send a monkey into space

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite

The first step to build an anti satellite missile is to send a payload into space.  To first step to understand this is to take a basic  Newtonian physics course so you may want to start with that.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2011, 09:29:49 PM by maydayfire »
it's time to nut up or shut up!

Offline Numbers

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 759
  • au
  • Respect: +23
    • World News
Iran's current plan is already the best. To use Satelite Jamming Device against GPS, Communication and Spy Satellites.

Exploding HE Warhead in Outer Space delivered by "Expendable Launch Vehicle" (such as Iranian Safir) is not a good idea. Safir will be able to launch 27 kilograms of HE Warhead to hit any target in LEO (160–2,000 kilometers altitude) satellite. But not GPS
Satellites (20,200 kilometers altitude).

The problem is that debris from destroyed Satellite and debris from HE Warhead will make the LEO more unusuable. LEO orbit of 800-1.500 kilometers is already cluttered with debris that cause malfunction of Satellites. Sun-synchronous orbit (600–800 kilometers
altitude) for Spy Satellites is also cluttered by debris.

So it is not recommended to use HE Warheads or destroy Satellites at LEO. Any Anti Satellite war will cause the shut down of LEO orbit (for estimated 10-20 years).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris#Debris_in_LEO
"Collisions thus usually occur at very high relative velocities, typically several kilometres per second.[50] Such a
collision will normally create large numbers of objects in the critical size range, as was the case in the 2009
collision. It is for this reason that the Kessler Syndrome is most commonly applied only to the LEO region. In this
region a collision will create debris that will cross other orbits and this population increase that leads to the
cascade effect."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris#Threat_to_unmanned_spacecraft
"In a Kessler Syndrome cascade, satellite lifetimes would be measured on the order of years or months. New satellites
could be launched through the debris field into higher orbits or placed in lower ones where natural decay processes
remove the debris, but it is precisely because of the utility of the orbits between 800 and 1,500 kilometres (930 mi)
that this region is so filled with debris."
« Last Edit: November 01, 2011, 12:37:19 PM by Numbers »

 

SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.381 seconds with 23 queries.