Iran Military Forum







Author Topic: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada  (Read 3492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« on: September 27, 2011, 08:26:50 PM »
0
Turkey launched its first domestic built war ship Heybeliada. How this compares to Jamaran? Which is more advanced?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgem_class_corvette

The design of the turkish ship looks more modern for me... And it seems they did it in a short time ( 3 years?)

Online aryana

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 2893
  • ir
  • moores law driving force of innovation
  • Respect: +39
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2011, 08:53:02 PM »
0
it is 700 tons heavier.
it has harpoon.
and modern anti missile defence.
Iran Khodro largest auto maker in larger middle east

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2011, 08:27:16 AM »
0
Video of the ship:

GÖRÜNMEZ SAVAŞ GEMİSİ TCG HEYBELİADA - STEALTH WARSHIP-MILGEM CORVETTE Small | Large

Offline Eagle2009

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • Respect: +11
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2011, 03:34:25 AM »
+1
The Milgem class is probably some 25+ years ahead of the Jamaran is technology and abilities. I actually compared the Milgem to the Jamaran in terms of capabilities when the Jamaran was launched last year.

It's larger size has nothing to do with it being a better vessel..it's these things:

1. Stealth- Uses modern stealth surface design and construction, giving it a RCS to surface search radar of a small patrol boat or fishing boat and not a 2000+ ton Corvette.
2. Air Defense- Unlike the Jamaran's antiquated 4 SM-1MRs for air defence, the Milgem class features two different SAM systems. A Mk 41 vertical launch system capable of carrying dozens of Evolved SeaSparrow missiles (>50km range), and a RAM (rolling airframe missile) short range defense system designed to take out both subsonic and supersonic anti-shipping missiles.
3. Anti-Shipping Missiles- The Milgem can carry 8 Harpoon or Exocet missiles compared to the Jamaran's 4 missiles.
4. Aviation- While both vessels can carry small/medium size helicopters, the Milgem can carry it in a hangar allowing for more long range operations.
5. Electronics- the Milgem is stocked full of advanced and modern radar, communication, ECM, and optic systems. The Jamaran's electronics suite is 'fine' but not in the same technology class as the equipment used on the Milgem.

Overall, the Jamaran armament and equipment are fairly equivalent to similar vessels deployed in the late 70's and early 80's.
"I never did give anybody hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell."
- Harry Truman

Offline reza18

  • استوار دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1699
  • Respect: +213
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2011, 07:54:59 AM »
0
It's all nice a well..But Eagle jan..I think it's somewhat wrong to compare Iran's Jamaran to the Turkish one..Mind you Iran build her ship under massive western sanctions that are aimed at preventing Iran from obtaining such tech in the first place..The Turks on the other hand can pretty much buy all the components they need to assemble the ship as they not under any sanctions...Got my drift????

Offline impera

  • سرباز عادى
  • *
  • Posts: 150
  • ru
  • Respect: +27
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2011, 09:45:05 AM »
0
2. Air Defense- Unlike the Jamaran's antiquated 4 SM-1MRs for air defence, the Milgem class features two different SAM systems. A Mk 41 vertical launch system capable of carrying dozens of Evolved SeaSparrow missiles (>50km range), and a RAM (rolling airframe missile) short range defense system designed to take out both subsonic and supersonic anti-shipping missiles.

Corvette Milgem has only single RAM .

Quote
Eight of the twelve Milgem class warships will be named the Ada class and will be classified as corvettes, while four of them will be named the F-100 class and will be classified as frigates.
 The F-100 class will be equipped with the Mk.41 VLS and ESSM, along with other additional systems for improved multirole combat capabilities. The Mk.41 VLS (Vertical Launching System) is capable of firing RIM-66 Standard, RIM-162 ESSM and VL ASROC missiles, and the F-100 class frigates will be used as a testing platform for the new class of four indigenous AAW frigates of the Turkish Navy, known as the TF-2000 program.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 09:51:30 AM by impera »

Offline farbod

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 702
  • en
  • Respect: +117
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2011, 10:30:33 AM »
0
We need to wait for the jamran 2 , they said its much more advance.

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2011, 12:37:12 PM »
0
@Eagle

I agree that Milgem looks more modern and stealth than the Jamaran. I can also imagine that they have better electronics since they can get them easily. However it would be also interesting to see what Turkey is actually producing and what they import and assemble in the ship.

Concerning the antiship missiles, i was looking a bit into the combat history of Harpoon. I didn't find lots of info, other than it was used to sink an Iranian ship in 1988. On the other hand the C802  and its variants (nour, Qadir) has shown to be capable of hitting modern ships with stealth technology as the INS Hanit and one Sa'ar 4.5 during the Lebanon war 2006. This was done in harsh combat environments. So i guess the antiship capabilities are quite similar. The fact that Jamaran has only 4 tubes can be changed easily if required i guess.


Offline Eagle2009

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • Respect: +11
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2011, 10:23:07 PM »
+1
Impera,

Not sure what you're getting at, you second quote proves exactly what I said. The Milgem class (which are also known as the F-100 class) will be armed with the Evolved SeaSparrow (which is carried by the Mark 41 VLS) and the RIM-166 RAM system. That is exactly what I said before. The vessel Heybeliada hasn't be fitted with the Mk 41 yet because it is the first of the class. The second vessel of that class, the Büyükada will be fitted with both systems and this will be standard from the vessel on.

Reza18,

the8march is the one who started this thread wanting to know how the two vessels compared, excuse me for trying to answer his question.

the8march,

Actually the Milgem hull design was done in Turkey, it is not a foreign design simply assembled in Turkey. So clearly they are capable of designing such a vessel. Also almost all the electronics are also of Turkish origin. The main components of the vessel that are imported are the weapons.

And for the record, the main reason the C-802 was able to hit the Saar 5 class vessel (not Saar 4.5, there is a HUGE difference) was the crane that is attached to the helipad was exposed and not inside the hangar it usually was. This is why there was so little damage done to the vessel. The missile was homing in on the exposed crane and hit it, not the hull itself. If the C-802 had actually hit the hull at the waterline like it normally does, the Saar 5 would be at the bottom of the Med, not returning to port UNDER ITS OWN POWER. So if the C-802 was fired at the similarly stealthy Milgem, there's no knowing how well it could have homed in on it for sure, but using the INS Hanit incident is a bad example since it was the Hanit's stealthy design that likely saved it from being sunk in the first place.

Also, I never said the Harpoon was superior to the Noor in the first place. I just said the Milgem will care twice the missiles.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 10:26:49 PM by Eagle2009 »

Offline Eagle2009

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • Respect: +11
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2011, 10:31:13 PM »
0
Impera,

I actually owe you an apology. After doing so further reading, the Heybeliada isn't armed with the Mk 41 because it will be the first of the "Ada Class" corvettes and they will only be armed with the RAM system.

The Büyükada will be the first of the TF-100 class which will be fitted with both the RAM and ESSM.

So I will refrain from using the Milgem class term from now on since there are actually two separate (both related) classes that are both called "Milgem class".

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2011, 09:01:18 AM »
0
Eagle2009,

It seems that the Milgem was designed in Turkey and not reverse engineered. But there are some similarities with the German MEKO ships. But this is fine. I think they did a good job here.

As for the anti ship capabilities, as i said, Iran can install more missiles if they want. I dont find this problematic. From the combat history of Harpoon and Nour, it seems they are both effective. I am afraid a thorough comparison of the performance is not possible with the few data we have.

 i really doubt that the Jamaran will come into a ship to ship combat in case of war. Most probably will be facing aircrafts. So the air defense is the most important. And the systems produced by Iran are still not combat proven. In the Lebanon war 2006, they were either not used or not effective!

Offline M-ATF

  • استوار
  • *
  • Posts: 1772
  • ir
  • Respect: +565
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2011, 11:14:14 AM »
0
Does Milgem corvette use phased array radar?

The reason of shorter time of construction of Milgem is that Turks have this chance to import components or technology or license production .I guess they have used at least consolution of other companies, they can easily recieve such helps.

But Iran has to design and produce all components, systems and subsystems by herself .

I beilieve project of Jamaran frigate hasnt been finished yet and it is under development, next phase of this project is installation of phased array radar, and most likely after that next phase is installation of new naval SAM ( Based Tor or Crotal?). and in finnal comparison we should consider costs too (I guess its not possible)
« Last Edit: September 30, 2011, 11:24:30 AM by M-ATF »

Offline ahriman46

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 371
  • gb
  • Respect: +16
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2011, 04:12:14 PM »
0
we have this one coming soon aswell

Mowj Class Ship, 2nd Building Footage (2nd Jamaran Frigate) Small | Large

Offline reza18

  • استوار دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1699
  • Respect: +213
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2011, 04:52:01 PM »
0
Eagle2009, I wasn't criticising your point..In fact, I think you're right in your assertion..I was only drawing your attention to other aspects of this Turkish ship..Sorry if I offended you..

Offline M-ATF

  • استوار
  • *
  • Posts: 1772
  • ir
  • Respect: +565
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 2011, 04:59:20 AM »
0
Heybeliada doesnt use phased array radar so most likely Jamaran will surpass Heybeliada on this field (I guess after development of naval SAM, gennerally Jamaran will surpass Heybeliada at the feild of air-defence, but for such judgment we should wait to see Do really Iranian produce their own naval SAM and do they eauip Jamaran by it or not)

but it seems next Milgem Class will use ASELSAN phased array radar, I find a phased array radar of ASELSAN , a 3d radar with the name of ADR (I dont know they want to use this radar on Milgem or not):


Intrestingly it is very simlar to 3d AN-MPQ-64 sentinel radar:



And whats your opinion about similarities of US freedom class warsips and this milgem class corvette :




Now I can guess how much of their technologies are really domestical and original; and how they can design, develop, test and produce their warships domestically at such short time.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2011, 07:06:41 AM by M-ATF »

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2011, 02:05:29 PM »
0
US freedom class and Milgem are similar. They made use of the designs of the ships they have. If Iran had access to such modern ships, they would have used them in the design as well.

Offline M-ATF

  • استوار
  • *
  • Posts: 1772
  • ir
  • Respect: +565
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2011, 04:02:11 PM »
0
US freedom class and Milgem are similar. They made use of the designs of the ships they have. If Iran had access to such modern ships, they would have used them in the design as well.

The difference is that when Iran builds a weapon based foregin weapons , she builds it by reverse engineering (and domestical modifications like below images ) by herself. But certainly Turks recieve direct help and technology from their foreign partners.
They dont need to study the original weapon, design , build , test and then again modify design , build , test ... and finnaly reach to start point of problem of mass production of it.
I believe they directly use foreign core technology inside a new cover and Turkish brand.

These are images of angular coordination block of original S-200 system and Iranian built version of the same block :



 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 04:25:55 PM by M-ATF »

Online the8march

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • lb
  • Respect: +395
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2011, 09:07:46 PM »
0
MATF,
Very nice images. The original design seems very old. The Iranian version is definitly more modern however not to standards of 2011. There is a date on the photo, 25.04.87. Is this persian calender or normal western?

Offline M-ATF

  • استوار
  • *
  • Posts: 1772
  • ir
  • Respect: +565
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2011, 01:46:28 AM »
0
MATF,
Very nice images. The original design seems very old. The Iranian version is definitly more modern however not to standards of 2011. There is a date on the photo, 25.04.87. Is this persian calender or normal western?
I guess it is persian

Offline Eagle2009

  • سرگرد
  • *
  • Posts: 3081
  • Respect: +11
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2011, 04:49:12 AM »
0
Reza18,

No offense was taken and I apologize for being too "gruff" with you, I didn't need to sound so harsh in my response.

Gents,

I honestly so no similarity between the Freedom class and Milgem family of vessels. It is purely superficial. Most stealth vessels today look something alike simply because they are "stealth" designs which are all based on the same fundamental ideas, hence why they look alike. The two vessels have major structural differences (including a major size differences) which are too distinct for the designs to likely be related.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2011, 04:58:31 AM by Eagle2009 »

Offline M-ATF

  • استوار
  • *
  • Posts: 1772
  • ir
  • Respect: +565
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2011, 07:03:03 AM »
0
Eagle
How many stealth frigate and corvette do you now with similar design to design of these freedom and Milgem class warships?
Similarities of these two warship is more than general similarities between all stealth warships.

I dont say they are the same design, but I guess Turkey has benifited direct help of Americans and their design.

whats your opinion about their ADR radar? Do you beleive its original and domestical?
Turkey is going to build a medium to longrange phased array radar that shares important features with GroundMaster radars that is another product of ThalesRaython.


Offline farbod

  • سرجوخه
  • *
  • Posts: 702
  • en
  • Respect: +117
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2011, 04:24:06 PM »
-1
irans conventional military is a joke, in time for war our missiles will be our real weapons.

Offline ahriman46

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 371
  • gb
  • Respect: +16
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #22 on: October 08, 2011, 04:16:19 PM »
0
irans conventional military is a joke, in time for war our missiles will be our real weapons.
and our speed boats!

Offline spectator

  • سرباز دوم
  • *
  • Posts: 341
  • gb
  • Respect: +4
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2011, 01:20:11 AM »
0
the future is missiles, missiles and missiles of all types. Iran making the correct decision investing heavily on missiles

Offline Apollyon

  • گروهبان سوم
  • *
  • Posts: 966
  • al
  • animu mango
  • Respect: +53
Re: Jamaran vs Turkish Heybeliada
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2011, 06:55:41 AM »
0
the future is missiles, missiles and missiles of all types. Iran making the correct decision investing heavily on missiles

Even more important than both is, intel., IT and military hackers, the best of the best at computer science that train all their lives to thwart enemy computers.

The fact is, even as our missile technology improves, their anti-missile defense and every other sort of technology will also improve, perhaps even faster as they are much larger than us and have more resources, and far more scientists and engineers available to their populations.

The one commonality between all future military technologies is use of cutting edge computer programs. Even without the best hardware, having the most competent of hackers and supercomputers for cracking enemy computers and intercepting / decrypting communications will make most of their technical edge at least unreliable.

In addition, you don't need lots of foreign technology to train the best hackers, or to build up a significant military IT industry cooperation, or to make your own software.

I cannot understate the importance of competent computer scientists, hackers, IT people, and relevant technologies for future conflicts!
« Last Edit: October 09, 2011, 06:57:44 AM by Apollyon »
"The sword is victorious over money, the master-will subdues again the plunderer-will. . . A power can be overthrown only by another power, not by a principle, and only one power that can confront money is left. Money is overthrown and abolished by blood. Life is alpha and omega . . . It is the fact of facts within the world-as-history."

- Oswald Spengler

 

SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.687 seconds with 24 queries.