Impera,
Not sure what you're getting at, you second quote proves exactly what I said. The Milgem class (which are also known as the F-100 class) will be armed with the Evolved SeaSparrow (which is carried by the Mark 41 VLS) and the RIM-166 RAM system. That is exactly what I said before. The vessel Heybeliada hasn't be fitted with the Mk 41 yet because it is the first of the class. The second vessel of that class, the Büyükada will be fitted with both systems and this will be standard from the vessel on.
Reza18,
the8march is the one who started this thread wanting to know how the two vessels compared, excuse me for trying to answer his question.
the8march,
Actually the Milgem hull design was done in Turkey, it is not a foreign design simply assembled in Turkey. So clearly they are capable of designing such a vessel. Also almost all the electronics are also of Turkish origin. The main components of the vessel that are imported are the weapons.
And for the record, the main reason the C-802 was able to hit the Saar 5 class vessel (not Saar 4.5, there is a HUGE difference) was the crane that is attached to the helipad was exposed and not inside the hangar it usually was. This is why there was so little damage done to the vessel. The missile was homing in on the exposed crane and hit it, not the hull itself. If the C-802 had actually hit the hull at the waterline like it normally does, the Saar 5 would be at the bottom of the Med, not returning to port UNDER ITS OWN POWER. So if the C-802 was fired at the similarly stealthy Milgem, there's no knowing how well it could have homed in on it for sure, but using the INS Hanit incident is a bad example since it was the Hanit's stealthy design that likely saved it from being sunk in the first place.
Also, I never said the Harpoon was superior to the Noor in the first place. I just said the Milgem will care twice the missiles.