Iran Military Forum

http://www.alef.ir/vdcepw8zwjh8ewi.b9bj.html?142262

دلایل فقهی ضرورت نابودی اسرائیل
یادداشت مهمان: علیرضا فرقانی

. . .

مردم اسرائیل باید از بین بروند
اسرائیل تنها کشور عمدتاً یهودی در جهان است بر پایه آخرین سرشماری، سازمان مرکزی آمار اسرائیل، این کشور در حدود هفت میلیون و ۵۰۰ هزار تن جمعیت داشته‌است که در حدود پنج میلیون و ۷۰۰ هزار نفر از ساختار جمعیتی آن را یهودیان تشکیل داده‌اند. و مابقی ساختار جمعیتی از مسلمان‌ها، مسیحیان، دروزها و سامریون تشکیل شده‌است. هم‌چنین بزرگ‌ترین بخش از اقلیت‌های قومی را شهروندان موسوم به عرب اسرائیلی تشکیل می‌دهند.

ساکنین تل آویو، اورشلیم و حیفا را حتی با موشک های شهاب ۳ هم می توان مورد هدف قرار داد. تراکم و میزان جمعیت این سه نقطه که با کمترین فاصله از هم قرار دارند نزدیک ۶۰% از مردم اسرائیل را تشکیل می دهد. لذا می توان با موشک سجیل زیرساختها من جمله تاسیسات نیروگاهی، سوختی، آب و فاضلاب، حمل و نقل و ارتباطات و در مرحله بعدی با موشک های شهاب۳ و قدر و عاشورا فضای مسکونی شهر را تا انهدام قطعی مردم اسرائیل مورد حمله قرار داد.

if he is advocating the indiscriminate targeting of israeli civilians, then this should never have been published and the editor who allowed it should be held to account

such a posture is inherently immoral and gives fodder to iran's enemies who seek to portray the islamic republic as murderous and genocidal

the article doesn't represent the iranian govt, but people around the world know that iranian publications are strictly censored and will question why such a viewpoint would be allowed

this article has already been cited and distorted for propaganda purposes in zionist and western publications

As I discussed this on another thread, this guy's blog looks very suspicious. The blog has been used by Israelis propaganda machine in West to paint Iran as anti-Jews.

I think this guy should be investigated. There is no Islamic justification for preemptive murder of 5 million civilians. Anybody who thinks that Islam will allow this should get his brain checked. 

An ordinary person's strategic projection means nothing. That's one Iranian, vs thousands making worse comments about Iran every day.

But it shows the schizophrenic nature of the pro-zionist crowd, who on the one hand openly support the murder of Iranian civilians (such as the shahid scientists) and on the other play the innocent victim card by blowing the significance of commentaries like this one out of proportion.


That doesn't mean every opinion piece is read by the authorities before publication on the internet.

Just because they are psychopaths, it does not mean we should allow psychopaths to present this as Islamic ideology.
There is a diffrence between Shia and Sunni. Sunnis could make their own ijtihad and allow many things, but Shia cannot do the same. In this case there should be a fatwa for allowing this to be presented as Islam, because it contradicts Qu'ran.

We are not so weak to be worried abput the loose ruminations of some random 'blogger'. Aside from the technical religious issues brought forth (for right or wrong) I am unconcerned about this and, in fact, I believe it is a net positive.

Mamdali

Just so no one misunderstands me;

I don't think the targeting of civilians is at allowed in Islam, contrary to the zionists which have allowed for targeting of civilians in Gaza and south lebanon.

What i wanted to clarify is that in the zionist entity, everyone apparently is a soldier due to their own policy .

 

If you hit their civilians as a response to their attack, they'll calculate the cost is too hight to bare and the war will end much sooner and quicker..

Israeli's don't have civilians, they are all occupying soldiers and until they are faced with force and start fearing for their lives they will never leave.

- if he is advocating the indiscriminate targeting of israeli civilians -

I looked at a Bing translation, and it seemed to me to say that IF Israel first struck Iran, then Iran would respond by such actions as hitting Israel's Dimona reactor and Israel's infrastructure, thus making the area unlivable.

I've heard USA journalists / politicians and people talk about nuking mecca and "turning the Middle East into a parking lot" on occasions.

It would be ridiculous (though not unexpected) for the West to start complaining about this article.

---

If Israel knows that Iran will not respond by hitting civilians, then Israel will be more likely to conduct a first strike.
On the other hand, if Israel understands that Iran will target everything that Israel has if Israel makes a first strike, then Israel will be less likely to make the first move.

Israel is an invasion of the Middle East.
It is not a legitimate nation. It is an invasion.

It is not a cancer. A cancer is part of your own body that goes awry. Israel is not part of the Middle East. It is a foreign intrusion. It is an invasion.
I wish people would stop calling it a "cancer."  That's too kind a term for it. It is a knife in the ribs of the Mid East.

In my opinion, if Israel hits Iranian military sites, Iran should hit Israeli military sites.
If Israel hits Iranian civilian areas, Iran should respond likewise.